My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-17-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 08-17-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:30 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:31:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.. ~ <br /> , . <br />I- CITY OF ARDEN HilLS C{)~ <br /> MEMORANDUM '\'^Xc;,: <br />I ~ <br /> DATE: <br /> August 17, 1995 bVoJ.-~ <br />I <br /> TO: Mayor and City Council <br />I FROM: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director ~ <br /> SUBJECT: Gateway Business District Update l"---- <br />I .~ <br /> The City Council, at its July 20, 1995 Worksession achieved consensus to discontinue <br /> negotiations with Everest as it pertains to the Development Agreement for the development of the <br />. Gateway Business District (GBD). The following outline is presented to facilitate preliminary <br /> discussion on the extent of City involvement in the development of the GBD. <br />I 1. Baseline Site Information <br /> The updating of the infrastructure requirements, particularly the traffic component is of <br />I critical importance. The pending improvements of Highway 96 and the interchange at <br /> Interstate 35W and Highway 96 should be dovetailed into the GBD planning process. The <br /> identification of environmental constraints, such as; wetlands, floodplain, and shoreland <br />I- areas should also be identified. Also, the need to update the estimated acquisition, <br /> relocation and demolition costs should be reviewed. Lastly, the inclusion of the <br /> Indykavitz and Vaughn properties into the GBD should be discussed. <br />I 2. Visioninl! <br /> After a careful review of the development constraints and opportunities have been <br />I completed, it may be appropriate to review the vision for the GBD. If a modification of <br /> the vision is contemplated, then the involvement of the Planning Commission may be <br /> appropriate if the modification may result in changes to the zoning ordinance. <br />I ~ DeveloDment Options <br /> J. <br /> The next step may include an analysis of the development options for the GBD, such as; <br />I the preparation ofa Request For Proposal (RFP), City development of the GBD, allowing <br /> market forces guided by the zoning district standards to develop the GBD, or a <br /> combination of the above. <br />I 4. Horn Oak and Leather <br />I Staff has been discussing development options with representatives ofHom Oak and <br /> Leather. Hom Oak and Leather wishes to construct a protype corporate office, retail, and <br /> warehouse facility on the Naegele Property. They have presented staff with a concept <br />I plan which develops the site, but strives not to preclude other development scenarios from <br /> occurring in the GBD.. Staff will be presenting this concept plan at the W orksession, for <br /> . the City Council's information. <br />. <br /> KR\jt <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.