Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 14. 1995 II <br /> I Councilmember Malone inquired if there was an outlet in Karth Lake. Mr. Stonehouse indicated <br /> . there was not. Councilmember Malone suggested an alternate be added to include some sort of <br /> pump station or mechanism for outlet. <br /> . MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 95-59, Authorizing <br /> The Preparation of Plans and Specifications and also direct the City Engineer to <br /> prepare preliminary analysis for a Karth Lake level control mechanism. Motion <br /> . carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> Midwest Asphalt Pay Estimate Numher One (1) <br /> . City Administrator Fritsinger indicated based upon the work completed as of July 31, 1995, the total <br /> amount of pay estimate number one is $376,375.65 and it is recommended by MSA consulting <br /> . engineers, that retainage in the amount of $37,637.57 be withheld from the Contractor's payment. <br /> Councilmember Malone indicated he has no doubt that this reconstruction project is the worst he has <br /> I ever encountered. He was unsure how to address the outstanding issues, but he noted the retainage <br /> fee may be a fair amount to withhold. He indicated if work continues in the same manner, the City <br /> I. use other options. <br /> Councilmember Hicks inquired as to the basis for the 10% retainage. Mr. Stonehouse noted the state <br /> . allows a 5% retainage and MSA Consulting typically retains up to 10% on early pay estimates until <br /> such point that 5% of the entire contract is reached. <br /> . Councilmember Hicks indicated the contractor will expect some retainage. Mr. Stonehouse <br /> indicated this is correct. <br /> I Councilmember Hicks stated he felt work already done should be paid for, but a clear message needs <br /> to be sent to the contractor regarding the outstanding issues and the City's displeasure. He indicated <br /> the contractor should be told if the outstanding issues are not addressed, the next payment may not <br /> I be as generous. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski indicated since 10% is typically withheld, to send a clear message, she <br /> I suggested an additional 5% should be added. She felt the contractor has not done right by the <br /> residents. <br /> . Mayor Probst indicated he originally was inclined to hold the motion over for two weeks, but by the <br /> contract the City must pay in a timely manner. He suggested sending a full payment with the noted <br /> . retainage, with a message from the City indicating future payments may not be as generous if the <br /> outstanding issue are not addressed. He noted once the asphalt is down, the City may hold a stronger <br /> .. position. <br /> . <br /> ------------- <br />