Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> I. ARDEN lilLLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 14, 1995 5 <br /> , Ms. Elizabeth Garski, 1795 West County Road F, indicated the problem was caused by the fact <br /> I that the sewer was not capped at the end of the work day by the construction crew. She noted the <br /> Public Works Superintendent also believed this to be the problem. She noted that she did realize this <br /> to be hearsay, but felt this is a clear show of neglect on behalf of the construction crew. <br /> I Ms. Garski indicated they were unable to use their air conditioning and the damage was <br /> unbelievable. She indicated this to be a continuous comedy of errors regarding the road <br /> I reconstruction. <br /> Councilmember Hicks noted the Council will be sympathetic. <br /> I Ms. Garski believed withholding payment would be the residents only leverage in the issue. He <br /> noted he would not want to have to sue the City and the contractor just to resolve this. <br /> I Mr. Joe Ricke, 1740 West County Road F, indicated he now has a twelve foot by six foot hole in <br /> his foundation. He stated his young family is unable to live there and expressed frustration regarding <br /> , the entire incident. He urged the City to continue investigating the situation. <br /> ,. Mayor Probst indicated the City will continue to investigate the concerns and will do what they can. <br /> He urged the citizens to continue to keep the City informed of any concerns. <br /> I Mayor Probst returned to item four on the agenda. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING - 1995 STREET MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT <br /> , Mayor Probst opened the Public Hearing at 8 :04 p.m. He noted this is a continuation of the Public <br /> Hearing held on July 31, 1995, therefore no additional notification was sent out. <br /> I City Engineer Stonehouse briefly reviewed the project and the reason why the Council is at this <br /> particular point. He noted the two issues brought up at the last council meeting were the corner lots <br /> I and outlots and the rate of assessments regarding both. <br /> Mr. Stonehouse indicated, based upon a review of the assessment calculations, the two residential <br /> I properties (1179 and 1194) at the westerly intersection were previously included at the corner lot rate <br /> using the length of the short plus one third of the long side. The two outlots were not calculated <br /> I using this method and the revised total assessment length for the Hunter's Park Homeowner's <br /> Association as a result of these revisions would be $3,554.87, a reduction of317,90 feet. <br /> , Mr. Stonehouse explained based upon this change the total assessment amount to the association <br /> would be reduced to $14,219.48 and the resulting assessment per lot is $209.11. <br /> ,. <br /> I <br />