My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-13-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 11-13-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:38 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> - <br /> -. I. Wetlands North of TH 96, Impacts/protection? <br /> - 2, Future Land Use/Access, Future development of the area north of TH 96 raises the <br /> following issues: <br /> . . What types of uses will be developed and how will they relate to/impact TH 96? <br /> . Access needs <br /> I . What standards, in terms of screening or landscaping should be implemented as <br /> part of the redevelopment? <br /> I 3, Centerville Road Intersection, Should area,wide improvements and upgrading be <br /> implemented around this intersection? <br /> I . Reduction and/or reconstruction of driveway access points <br /> . Turn-lanes <br /> . Landscaping/screening for developments <br /> . <br /> 4, Location of Regional Trail. ? <br /> . G. White Bear <br /> .....'. <br /> I- I. Centerville Road Intersection. Should area,wide improvements and upgrading be <br /> implemented around this intersection? <br /> I . Reduction and/or reconstruction of driveway access points ..' ~~ <br /> . Turn-lanes <br /> . Landscaping/ screening for developments <br /> I 2. I,35W Intersection. A number of issues need to be coordinated with MnDOT including: <br /> I . Intersection capacity <br /> . Need for/accommodation of pedestrian/bicycle paths on the bridge (none, one side, <br /> I or both sides) ~' <br /> 3, I,35W Entry/Gateway, Should a major entry/gateway to the TH 96 corridor be <br /> I developed at this location? If so, the improvements will need to be coordinated with <br /> MnDOT and the following issues will need to,be addressed: <br /> I . Responsibility for implementing the improvements <br /> . Location <br /> . Character and scale <br /> I . Upkeep and maintenance <br /> .- - <br /> 31 <br /> .1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.