Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> I ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> . <br /> . There are a number of areas of potential environmental concern in the corridor that may be critical <br /> to the development and design of the alternatives. These include wetlands, water quality, threatened <br /> I and endangered species, cultural resources and noise. In order to minimize the impacts of <br /> alternatives in these areas the resources and potential impacts were identified early in the process. <br /> Each of these environmental areas are discussed in the following sections. <br /> I WETLANDS <br /> I A preliminary analysis of potential wetlands located adjacent to Highway 96 was completed using <br /> the United States Fish and Wildlife National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, the Minnesota <br /> Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) Protected Waters and Wetlands map, Ramsey County <br /> I soil survey and aerial photography. <br /> I The NWI maps identified 35 wetlands in close proximity to the Highway 96 alignment. Twelve of <br /> these wetlands are listed as protected waters by the MnDNR. Several additional areas were <br /> identified as potential wetlands based on information from the Soil Conservation Service soil survey <br /> I and recent aerial photography. <br /> The field inventory was conducted on June 16, 1995. The approximate location and size of wetlands <br /> .- within the 150 foot wide corridor were noted, as well as the wetland'type and general vegetative <br /> characteristics of each basin. The wetland edge was ;;'01 delineated at this time, but was estimated <br /> ba,ed on aerial photography. <br /> I Foity~two potential wetlands were identified within the Highway 96 corridor during the field <br /> inventory (Table I). Due to the urban land use along much of the corridor, many of the wetlands <br /> I in the corridor have been previously disturbed. Ten of the Jlotential wetlands identified appear to <br /> have been excavated to facilitate roadside drainage. <br /> . Most of the wetlands could be classified as tempory or seasonally flooded, Types 1,2, and 3 (PEMA <br /> or PEMC) with reed canary grass, cattails and/or sedges as the dominant vegetation. Five wetlands <br /> I within the 150 foot corridor are DNR Protected Wetlands, three of which are classified as semi- <br /> permanently flooded PEMF wetlands. A few of the wetlands contain shrub or forest vegetation. <br /> I The typical right-of-way in this corridor is 150 feet. There are areas where the right-of-way is wider <br /> and a couple of areas where the right-of-way is na~ower. An estimate was made of the potential <br /> right-of-way impacts assuming the improvements used the entire 150 foot right-of-way. The <br /> . estimated impacts are also shown in Table I. Based on this assumption the estimated worst case <br /> wetland impact in the corridor is roughly 9 acres. Approximately 2.5 acres of this impact would be <br /> in DNR protected waters. It is possible that additional temporilry impacst could also be incurred <br /> I outside the construction zone. This impact estimate, does not include temporary impacts or areas <br /> I- 0 <br /> 39 <br /> - <br /> . <br />