CCP 11-13-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'''-> ~'.._-_. J ~ I ~ . 2. What signal/sign system modifications are required? :=l I . Locations _ · Special design/color ~ 1 I c. Corridor Image/Identity _ I I. What should the overall image of the corridor be? = 1 I · Standard roadway ~ · Special gateway/access to the communities along the corridor - ' · Special gateway/access plus unique treatments to create a special, distinct image :=l' I 2. What should the visual quality of the corridor be? - I · Spatial quality (open, enclosed, variable) _ 1 . Views/vistas (of lakes, open space, natural features) · Scenic/recreational stops/overlooks (such as a fishing bridge at the Pleasant - I Lake/Sucker Lake aqueduct) _ " e 3. What should the overall landscaping/urban design treatments along the corridor be? _ ..~~ I . None, except what cities or developers install on their own . Some special landscaping/urban design at key locations ---, I · Special landscaping/urban design treiltments throughout the corridor --~- ,. ~ I 4. Should major entry/gateway statements/features b~ considered for the corridor? _ , . None ""_ I · At the I-35W and 1-35E intetsections._ · At the I-35W and 1-35E intersections, as well as at other selected intersections --. . Responsibility, cost, maintenance I 5. Should the cities along the corridor have identifying signs/monuments at the city bound- .. aries? .. -- I . No special signs" ~_ . Standard MnDOT type signs I · Special monuments -.c..- . Responsibility, cost, maintenance __ __ I 6. Should special treatments (landscaping and/or urban design) be developed at major public ill. e' facilities, such as city halls, community centers, etc.? - I 22 - I ~.