My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-16-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCP 11-16-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:41 PM
Creation date
11/6/2006 4:40:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I, c.t~/~ <br /> , <br /> II . 3. Distance Requirements <br /> I~ Another factor that may be examined by some courts is the distance requirement. <br /> established by an adult entertainment zoning ordinance. In SOJ, Inc. v. Houston, 837 <br /> II F.2d 1268 (5th Cir. 1988), the Court was asked to invalidate a 750-foot distancing <br /> requirement on the ground that the city had not proved that 750 feet, as opposed to <br /> , some other distance, was necessary to serve the city's interest. <br /> I, <br /> I The Court found that an adult entertainment zoning ordinance is "sufficiently well <br /> I; tailored if it effectively promotes the government's stated interest" and declined to <br /> "second-guess" the city council. Houston, supra, 837 F.2d at 1276. <br /> - <br /> I Courts have sustained both requirements that sexually oriented businesses be <br /> , located at specified distances from each other, ~ Younq, supra, (upholding distance <br /> I requirement of 1000 feet between sexually oriented businesses), and requirements that <br /> I sexually oriented businesses be located at fixed distances from other sensitive uses, <br /> ~ Renton, supra, (upholding distance requirement of 1000 feet between sexually <br /> Ie oriented businesses and residential zones, single-or-multiple family dwellings, <br /> churches, parks or schools). <br /> I The Working Group heard testimony that when an ordinance establishes distances <br /> between sexually oriented uses, an additional regulation may be needed to prevent <br /> , operators of these businesses to defeat the intent of the regulation by concentrating <br /> I sexually oriented businesses of various types under one roof, as in a sexually oriente_d <br /> I mini-mall. The city of St. Paul has adopted an ordinance preventing more than one <br /> adult use (e.g., sexually oriented theater, bookstore, massage parlor) from locating <br /> within a single building. A similar ordinance was upheld in the North Carolina case of <br /> j Hart Book Stores, Inc. v. Edmisten, 612 F. 2d 821 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. <br /> 929 (1980). <br /> * The experience with multiple-use sexually oriented businesses at the University- <br /> I Dale intersection suggests that these businesses have a greater potential for causing <br /> neighborhood problems than do single-use sexually oriented businesses. Following <br /> I Renton, it is suggested that lawmakers document the adverse effects which the <br /> ~. -39- <br /> ~ <br /> --- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.