CCP 11-16-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

yo/~ I .- 1964. See Stratton v. Drumm, 445 F. Supp. 1305, 1310-11 (D. Conn. 1978); Cianciolo v. Members of City Council, 376 F. Supp. 719, 722-24 (E.D. Tenn. 1974); Joseph v. I House, 353 F. Supp. 367, 374-75 (E.D. Va.), aff'd sub nom. Joseph v. Blair, 482 D.2cf 575 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 955, 94 S. Ct. 1968 (1974). Contra, Aldred v. I Dulinq, 538 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1976). Although the Working Group expressed strong conCern about the operation of I prostitution under the guise of massage parlors, this type of regulation is not advisable because legitimate therapeutic massage establishments could find their operations . curtailed. Prostitution may be better controlled through prosecution and use of post- conviction actions such as forfeiture or enjoining a public nuisance. I In 1985, a court upheld an ordinance making it unlawful to display for commercial I purposes material "harmfulto minors" unless the material is in a sealed wrapper and, if the cover is harmful to minors, has an opaque cover. Upper Midwest Booksellers Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis, 780 F.2d 1389 (8th Cir. 1985). Last year, the legislature I enacted a state law similarly prohibiting display of sexually explicit material which is -. harmful to minors unless items arB kept in sealed wrappers and, where the cover itself would be harmful to minors, within opaque covers. Minn. Stat. S 617.293 (1988). This' law has the potential to protect minors from exposure to sexually oriented materials. I Communities also have considerable discretion to regulate signage so that the exterior of sexually oriented businesses does not expose unwitting observers to sexually explicit I messages. RECOMMENDATIONS I 1. Prior to enacting licensing regulations, communities should I document findings ot adverse secondary effects of sexually oriented I businesses and the relationship between these effects and proposed regulations so that such regulations can be upheld If challenged In court. I . -44- -. I I