My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-30-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CC 01-30-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:46 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 9:18:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 30, 2006 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Holdcn asked them if they could get the decibels down to 65. Mr. Joe Dcnzel <br />responded it was possible to go down farther, but they could not afford to go down any further <br />than 75 decibels; it was not economically feasible for them. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski suggested they add a Condition 4 to read: In the future if there were any <br />complaints, Corporate Express will work with City staff to mitigate the complaint. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated there were two things in the January 16 letter, one the sound absorbing baffle <br />and the roof mount of the exhaust silencer. He asked if both of those things were going to he <br />done. Mr. Joe Denzcl responded that was correct. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla recommended Condition 3 read: Compliance with the sound attenuation and <br />procedures as described in the January 16, 2006. letter are followed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden requested Condition 5 to read: Corporate Express will work with staff <br />to find the appropriate time for the weekly testing. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council member Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br />motion to approve Planning Case 05-23: Corporate Express, 500 KW <br />Standby Generator subject to the two conditions as noted in staffs January <br />18, 2006, report and the addition of the three conditions as requested at <br />tonight's meeting. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> <br />Ms. Wolfe - Stated there would be a closed session following the regular Council meeting to <br />discuss a pending City arbitration. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Holdcn - Stated the Newsletter Committee meets tomorrow at 5:30 p.m. at <br />City Hall. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Grant - Summarized for Council the Planning Commission meeting January <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Larson - Stated he was unable to attend the January 9 meeting due to a <br />business trip, but he wanted to make some comments regarding Arden Plaza, which was <br />discussed at the January 9 Council meeting. He stated he cared a lot about the quality of <br />development that took place in the City and in the past the Council had not led enough with <br />respect to their expectations of developers. He stated the Arden Hills City expectations should <br />be more than the neighboring cities and he believed Arden Plaza gave them a golden opportunity <br />to say upfront what they wanted ITom developers. He stated their attitude should be that they <br />want to see quality development in the City and the materials set forth in the Zoning Code need <br />to be followed. He stated he was not sure what the process was to get to the guidance they <br />needed to do or they would lose the opportunity to say what they wanted to do with Arden Plaza. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.