My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-21-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CC 02-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:10:46 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 9:18:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session Meeting <br />February 21,2006 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski said that the developer deserves a second chance to purchase and develop the <br />property. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe asked the City Council if they were still comfortable with the office <br />condominium concept. <br /> <br />City Council agreed to considcr proposals for an office condo project at 1450 West Highway 96. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski requested that future comments and concerns be addressed by the Royal Oaks <br />Company at a future meeting. <br /> <br />elF Discussion <br />City Administrator Michelle Wolfe provided the City Council with an overview of the 2006- <br />2010 CIP discussion. She noted that this is a very complex issue for City staff to address. The <br />memo included in the work session packet outlined a number of different scenarios for the City <br />Council to consider, Members of the City Council were asked to address the status of the <br />sanitary sewer fund, possibility of purchasing a SCADA system, and concerns about the Inflow <br />and Infiltration (III) problems in the City, The CIP items for 2006 were approved as part of the <br />budgeting process. City staff is seeking guidance from the City Council regarding fund balances <br />and prioritizing future improvement projects, <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe also noted that state aid funding is available, but the City did utilize <br />MSA dollars for the Lexington Avenue and Red FoxlGrey Fox PMP project. If the City utilizes <br />MSA dollars for the proposed Snelling Avenue PMP project the City may have to borrow ahead <br />from the State of Minnesota to pay for futurc construction costs, depending on other project <br />decisions, Or, the Snelling Avenue project may need to be delayed. <br /> <br />Sanitary Sewer Fund- <br /> <br />If the proposed lift station project was eliminated from the 2006 CIP budget, the fund balance <br />would be about $900,000 at the end of 2009. If the City Council decides to construct the lift <br />stations, the fund balance would drop to $500,000. While it is difficult to acquire parts for the <br />older lift stations, the Operations and Maintenance Department feels that the current lift stations <br />can be maintained and operational for the next few years, With the newly identified inflow and <br />infiltration issues for the sanitary sewer system, staffrecommends that Council reject the bids for <br />the 2006 lift station project. <br /> <br />SCADA Svstem- <br /> <br />The City of Roseville is currently in the process of meeting with vendors to explore the options <br />of upgrading their sanitary sewer system with a SCADA system. As has been discussed in the <br />past, Roseville and Arden Hills may be able to jointly purchase the SCADA system, The joint <br />purchase could result in some cost savings and benefits for both communities, City staff is <br />currently reviewing the liability concerns to the City in regards to lift station failure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.