My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
05-28-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 10:02:52 AM
Creation date
6/14/2024 8:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
363
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — MAY 13, 2024 8 <br />Councilmember Holden stated this occurred on Katie Lane and one of the options that was <br />provided to the homeowner was the option to combine the two lots into one. However, she <br />understood this particular lot was buildable. <br />Mayor Grant indicated the assessment policy in 1997 would have been per linear foot and in <br />2004 the current assessment policy was approved, which was per lot. He stated this meant the <br />Council had to determine if this property was one lot or two. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the property owner could be charged an assessment if they <br />chose to subdivide the lot within a set period of time. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained in 2009 the City approved a <br />deferred assessment for one lot for 30 years or if triggered by a subdivision. <br />Councilmember Monson explained she was confused as to why this property would be charged <br />two assessments when it was one parcel. She questioned if the assessment could be triggered by <br />the sale of the second lot. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated the policy considered how the <br />property is platted and the second lot was buildable. <br />Councilmember Rousseau indicated there was a property on Keithson Avenue that has the same <br />issue, but they have not requested an appeal. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen agreed this was the case, noting the property <br />on Keithson Avenue would be assessed for both lots because they did not make an appeal. <br />Councilmember Rousseau questioned if a 50% break should be provided to the property on <br />Keithson Avenue. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated he would have to speak with the City <br />Attorney, but he believed because the City did not receive an appeal, the assessment would move <br />forward. <br />Councilmember Holden reported residents were given an ample amount of time to call or write <br />to the City and make an appeal. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen indicated this was the case, stating the 429 <br />process was very strict. <br />Mayor Grant stated he did not have a problem with a deferred assessment for the property at <br />1370 Colleen Avenue. He reported if the landowner were to subdivide the property in 10 years, <br />then they would be charged an assessment, but if it remains one lot, no additional assessment <br />would be charged. <br />Councilmember Monson indicated she was not convinced either way on how to proceed with <br />this matter. She understood this was only one parcel, but the lot could be subdivided and would <br />have a second buildable lot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.