Laserfiche WebLink
'It Attachment I <br />-A "EN ILLS <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />RESOLUTION NO.2024-029 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE <br />AT 1511 DAWN CIRCLE <br />WHEREAS, City Staff received a complete land use application for a variance to the side <br />yard setback on a corner lot from the City Code for the property located at 1511 Dawn Circle and <br />legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Subject Property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to construct an addition to an existing principal <br />structure and is seeking flexibility with the required side yard setback for a corner lot on the Subject <br />Property; and <br />WHEREAS, the Subject Property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District, which <br />requires a side yard setback for a corner lot of 40 feet on the Subject Property. The Applicant is <br />proposing a side yard setback of 28.2 feet; and <br />WHEREAS, a variance may be granted when it is in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the zoning ordinance if enforcement of a provision in the ordinance would cause the <br />landowner practical difficulties; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by June <br />8, 2024 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60- <br />day review period; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to prepare a Land Use Application Public <br />Policy Notification to notify all property owners within 500 feet of Subject Property when a request <br />for the Planning Commission is to occur related to a land use application that does not require a <br />public hearing; and <br />WHEREAS, the City's obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning <br />Commission reviewed the application on May 8, 2024. All written comments submitted in advance <br />of the meeting were presented to the Planning Commission; and <br />WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for a Variance <br />and, as such voted 7-0 in favor of recommending approval with conditions. <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />