Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 27, 2006 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />He indicated Waste Management has submitted a proposal to switch from the current two stream <br />commingled system to a single sort system. Under the single sort system, all recyclable materials <br />are placed into one 64-gallon container that is picked np every two weeks instead of each week <br />under the cnrrent system. The container would be provided by Waste Management as part of the <br />contract. Under the single sort system, the cost per household per month would be $2.26; <br />however, due to rising fuel costs, thc new contract would also include a fuel surcharge. The fuel <br />surcharge is based on the cost of fuel and, according to Waste Management, averaged eigbt <br />percent in 2005. To offset the costs ofthe containers, Waste Management would request a five- <br />year contract with the single sort system. <br /> <br />Staff recommended requesting a formal proposal and a sample contract for the single sort <br />recycling program. From brief discussions with staff in other communities that have <br />implemented the single sort system, we had only heard very positive comments regarding the <br />single sort system. The single sort system tends to be easier for residents, has increased the <br />amount of materials recycled, and, with fewer pickups each month, has resulted in less truck <br />traffic on residential streets. <br /> <br />Jennefer Klennert, Waste Management, summarized the Waste Management Single Sort <br />Recycling program. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she did not understand if they switched to every other week <br />recycling, why they were being charged a fuel surcharge. Ms. Klennert stated their fuel costs <br />have doubled and the way the contract was written now, the contract could not increase. It was <br />their intent to charge a fuel surcharge so they did not have to foot the entire cost of fuel. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant inquired about a five-year contract. He stated it seemed to make sense <br />that if they were going to award a five-year contract, they should look at the competition to see <br />what they were offering also. Ms. Klennert stated they were bringing this to the City as an <br />option, but they were willing to continue the contract, which has two years remaining. She noted <br />the five-year contract request would not be on top of the existing contract. She stated they were <br />requesting five-years from the date of the new contract. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he was concerned about the cost of the program. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson agreed and stated he was not comfortable going fOlWard with this <br />without putting it out to bid. He noted it appeared they would be doing double sort until 2008 <br />when the current contract expired. Ms. K1ennert stated they would not want to lose the contract, <br />so if Council wanted to wait to obtain bids in 2008, they will be a bidder. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski requested staff continue to research this and come back to Council at a <br />future work session. Councilmember Larson stated he was comfortable not going fOlWard at <br />this time if they did not have a competitive bidding process. He recommended they wait until the <br />end of the current contract and go out for bids. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated this would not preclude staff from collecting information. <br />