Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -APRIL 24, 2006 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. Execution of a performance agreement between the City and Chesapeake Companies, <br />in a form approved by the City Attorney; and <br />3. Chesapeake Companies must apply for a Final Plan approval prior to any grant- <br />related remediation work being started on the site. <br /> <br />She noted the grant applications were due by May 1. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the time frame was for the City to be reimbursed for the <br />match. City Attorney Filla responded the City would not be using City funds for tbis project <br />and the developer would fund this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked where the contamination came from. Diane Fredeen, <br />Chesapeake Companies, stated they were not positive where the contamination came from and <br />they did not know about the contamination until they tested the soil under the building, which <br />testing was required by the MN Pollution Control Agency. She stated they needed to remove the <br />contamination from the site. She indicated this was not a high contamination, but it did need to <br />be removed and brought to a landfill. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if they were going with the three building approach. Ms. Fredeen <br />replied they were proposing to build two buildings and not three, which she believed was one of <br />the original proposals. She noted to begin with they would be building one building and adding <br />the common area when the second building was built. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br />motion to approve Resolutions 06-31 and 06-32 Authorizing the <br />Application for Contamination Clean-up Grants from the Minnesota <br />Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), <br />Ramsey County, and the Metropolitan Council on behalf of Chesapeake <br />Companies for Brownfield remediation at the former ATS site, 1901 <br />Gateway Boulevard, subject to the three conditions as noted in staff's <br />April 20, 2006. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />D. PLANNING CASE 06-009: Motion to Approve a Variance Request: Vaul!hn <br />Morin, 1889 Grant Road <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant proposes to construct a 1,224 square toot 34 'x36' accessory <br />structure (garage) at 1889 Grant Road. Although the proposed garage would replace an existing <br />484 square foot 22'x22' structure, a portion of the foundation of the existing structure would be <br />retained for the new structure. In the R-2 Zone, properties are allowed up to 1,456 square feet of <br />accessory structure space; however, the Ordinance requires the 1,456 square feet to be divided <br />into no more than two structures that do not exceed 728 square feet each. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />According to the applicant, there was an attempt to formulate a design to attach the proposed <br />garage to the existing dwelling. However, a design that attached the garage to the dwelling <br />would have required a variance to encroach on the front line setback, a variance to encroach on <br />