My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-24 EDC Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
>
EDC Packets
>
2024
>
06-26-24 EDC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2024 12:50:34 PM
Creation date
6/20/2024 12:50:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION –MAY 22, 2024 2 <br />Chair Cupery stated the first question was if the EDC supports the top three strategies identified <br />by the ranking. He suggested doing a round table to get each Commissioner’s opinion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brausen suggested tying some of the strategies together by asking the businesses <br />to complete the survey when they do an in-person visit, noting he would be more apt to do so if <br />another business person asked him versus just having it sent to him. <br /> <br />Youth Commissioner Schneider stated having the in-person visits rank at the top of both lists <br />was a good thing as it reflects how the group values interaction with businesses. She suggested the <br />members each take a piece of the pie and contribute towards accomplishing in-person visits. <br /> <br />Commissioner Williams questioned if the Commission should have any other strategies <br />accomplished prior to conducting in-person visits. He provided an example such as having the <br />business directory updated prior to meeting with the businesses and before sharing that information <br />with them, or should they meet with the businesses and ask what information they feel would be <br />helpful prior to updating the directory so those suggestions could be incorporated as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Williams stated it was surprising to him that in-person business visits received high <br />interest because that would entail a lot of time. He noted that making an in-depth survey and <br />working on the website will also take a lot of time and require a degree of knowledge. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bonine stated he echoes Youth Commissioner Schneider’s well-said sentiment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gronquist stated she did not have anything to add and was in agreement. She said <br />she liked the idea of tying in the survey in-person as Commissioner Brausen suggested, and that <br />having that ready before the in-person visits would be a better use of time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bonine noted there probably would be higher engagement that way versus sending <br />an email. <br /> <br />A brief discussion ensued about what the process could potentially look like and it was noted that <br />when an in-person visit was conducted previously, businesses seemed to like that and felt better <br />supported. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Rousseau commented she had spoken to the owner of the Winkin’ Rooster. She <br />said that he is on Shoreview’s Economic Development Commission, noting he indicated they also <br />used a survey. She said Shoreview may have a template that could be used and thought they had <br />possibly worked with Ling Becker for such. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe suggested that the Commission use the survey to <br />gauge what it should be strategizing around and what is needed to supplement the Commission’s <br />needs. She asked if the Commission thought it would be beneficial to direct individuals to complete <br />the survey online, thus making onsite visits quicker. She noted the time commitment involved in <br />conducting an in-person visit that also includes gathering information for the survey at the same <br />time. She recommended the Commissioners plan for a certain amount of time be devoted to the <br />visit and suggested they decide which areas they want to focus on visiting first, whether that be by <br />a certain corridor or business type. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.