Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JUNE 24, 2024 5 <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained he was uncertain what <br /> Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant were referring to. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated whatever the City has in place now, may be fine, but noted an <br /> update may be required to address the vision for the community going forward. <br /> Councilmember Fabel questioned how ongoing investment relates to the prospect of Johanna <br /> Boulevard trail or Snelling Boulevard trail. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained the City has taken the lead on the <br /> Old Highway 10 project and the County has taken the lead on the Johanna Boulevard trail. He <br /> indicated these were competing projects that had pursued separate grant opportunities. <br /> Mayor Grant stated there was some value in going through the current Parks Master Plan, <br /> especially to provide updates to the trail connections. He understood there were two costly trail <br /> sections that needed to be completed. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau indicated she supported the City Council completing a Parks Master <br /> Plan. She questioned why the Mounds View High School has not created an SRTS plan in the <br /> past. <br /> Mr. McGarvey stated he was uncertain why this had not been completed by the school. He <br /> reported the trail along Lake Valentine Road was successful without a SRTS plan. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau explained she would be interested in sharing the results from the <br /> SRTS grant funding with the school along with discussing how important support from the school <br /> district would be to the City. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated the City may be asking for too much right now. She did not <br /> believe the City would receive any State bonding funding because all of the asks, which did not <br /> look appropriate. She commented on how the upcoming election may impact future funding <br /> requests. She questioned how many residents south of I-694 were walking to the high school. <br /> Mr. McGarvey indicated he did not have the numbers in front of him, but noted the project <br /> scored well relative to the broader scope of the project and that there would be a connection to <br /> Arden Manor. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how much of this roadway was considered City versus County. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported all of the roadway was owned by <br /> the County. <br /> Mayor Grant commented in the more detailed write up, the County's contribution for this project <br /> was to be $500,000,but the County was not able to make this commitment. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained the County's policy states they <br /> will match 50% of the overall costs for a project, however, at this time, they did not have funding <br /> to meet their policy, which meant the County would be providing $550,000 for this project. <br />