Laserfiche WebLink
Assessments: Not a special feeling Page 2 of 3 <br /> Grove, which raised $41 million, and Woodbury, with $25 million. Coon Rapids, Eagan <br /> and Cottage Grove also were near the top of the list. <br /> 411 <br /> But the list doesn't say what portion of the tab was picked up by homeowners. That <br /> varies from city to city. <br /> St. Paul, however, uses special assessments for projects well beyond most <br /> municipalities. It uses special assessments to pay for everything from tree trimming to <br /> snow removal to road reconstruction, in part because of cuts in state aid to local <br /> governments, in part to avoid raising citywide property taxes, said Matt Smith, St. Paul's <br /> finance director. <br /> Assessing assessments <br /> For some homeowners, assessments seem like a fair way to pay for improvements near <br /> their property — especially if it's a couple thousand dollars to replace crumbling <br /> sidewalks. They may not be thrilled about the cost, but they understand that cities need a <br /> way to pay for special services. <br /> Paul Laederach of Edina agrees with his city that roads in his historic Country Club <br /> neighborhood are in bad shape and need replacing. But the senior citizen balks at the <br /> cost. While the city will bear half of the cost of the $19.7 million project to replace and <br /> • repair streets, street lighting, water and sewer systems, homeowners still are paying <br /> $18,210 to $22,900 each. <br /> "Taxes keep going up, but our income doesn't," Laederach said. <br /> Some of his neighbors are less charitable in their assessments. "It's unconscionable to <br /> levy such a large amount to an individual property owner," said Margo Hoppman. "A <br /> project of this scope and magnitude should be shared by all of Edina." <br /> In Edina, homeowners pay the entire cost of street replacement. Two years ago, the City <br /> Council talked about sharing that cost, but there was concern about reversing the policy <br /> when many homeowners had already paid those fees. <br /> Most homeowners simply pay their bills. <br /> In Brooklyn Park, Patricia Hoehn said she was "shocked and dismayed" several years <br /> ago when she learned the city wanted to connect her bucolic neighborhood of big lots <br /> and gravel roads to city streets, water and sewer at a cost of more than $80,000 per <br /> household. <br /> While some of her neighbors broke up their 2.5-acre lots, selling excess land to <br /> • developers, Hoehn decided to keep the big wooded lot where she has lived for 35 years. <br /> The city deferred $17,000 until she sells or divides her lot. She paid $53,000. <br /> "I raised my family here," Hoehn said. "Something this size ... does take your breath <br /> http://www.startribune.com/templates/Print This Story?sid=14446556 I/28/2008 <br />