Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL -JULY 3 I, 2006 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Water Commissioners approved it. The previous contract was a twenty-year contract. The new <br />contract is also for twenty years. <br /> <br />She recommended Council approve the contract for water services between the City of Roseville <br />and the City of Arden Hills. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Pellegrin moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br />motion to approve the contract for water services between the City of <br />Rosevil1e and the City of Arden Hills. The motion carried unanimously (4- <br />0). <br /> <br />G. Motion to Approve Chanl!e Order #2 Amt Construction in the amount 0($15,000 for <br />the 2006 PMP Proiect <br /> <br />Ms. Giga stated construction for the 2006 PMP improvement project has begun. Residents have <br />continued to express concerns regarding the preservation of trees and the overall integrity of the <br />neighborhood. Staff has responded to these concerns by making some adjustments to the <br />proposed utility work on the plans, and shifting alignments where possible to avoid additional tree <br />removal. With the revisions, most trees of concern can be protected. However, the contractor has <br />expressed a concern about the revisions, particularly at the Siems Court and Arden Place <br />intersection. The proposed storm sewer is extremely deep in this intersection. When installed, the <br />depth of the storm sewer will expose many of the existing utilities in the intersection, including <br />the watermain. Given the age and material of the pipe, the contractor is concerned about having <br />"live" watermain exposed while their crews are working underneath it. The contractor is <br />proposing to provide temporary water service to 15 homes in the Siems Court cul-de-sac while the <br />intersection work is completed, this would enable them to shut offthe watermain providing a safer <br />work environment for the crew installing the storm sewer. The contractor has quoted the price for <br />this work to be $313,420. <br /> <br />She indicated the amount of the change order would be charged to the Water Fund. <br /> <br />She recommended Council approve Change Order #2 for the 2006 PMP project, not to exceed <br />$13,420.00. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the definition of temporary was. Ms. Giga responded it <br />would be for the duration it took them to get through the intersection, possibly a week. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked when they were bidding on this did they not have any information <br />to show the watermains were at this depth. Ms. Giga responded this came up when they were <br />reviewing the plans with the contractor and after they had made revisions to the plans per the <br />residents' requests. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if there was a way to minimize the cost by making a connection <br />back to the service line. He believed it was expensive to reconnect each individual home. Ms. <br />Giga responded they were looking at ways to reduce the cost and this was the quote given by the <br />contractor, but noted it could be just as expensive if not more expensive to reconnect the service <br />line. <br />