Laserfiche WebLink
The Griggs & San tow Weekly Report Monday, February <br /> 9, 2009 <br /> 295 Madison Avenue-#1130 Telephone: (212) 867-6111 <br /> ',New York, N.Y. 10017 E-mail: griggs(a,nyct.net <br /> —Editorial- <br /> We have developed a new adage for the President—"too many economic advisors can spoil the broth." <br /> This could well be the case in the new administration. An economist who is intellectually bright is nice; <br /> an economist who has common sense and street smarts, along with being intellectually bright, is better. <br /> In the case at hand, there appears to be a growing rift between Paul Volcker and Larry Summers with re- <br /> spect to influence and power. Given the personalities of both these individuals, this conflict should have <br /> been realized before the appointments were made, and needs to be resolved before economic damage is <br /> done. All we can say at this point is that if the President were to have only one economic adviser, it <br /> should be Paul Volcker— hands down. <br /> Monday—February 9th: <br /> No releases. <br /> Tuesday—February 10`R: <br /> No releases. <br /> Wednesday—February nth: <br /> Foreign trade deficit(Dec)—From July to November 2008, the monthly foreign trade deficit dropped <br /> •harplY from -$61.1 billion to -$40.4 billion. This would be great news if it continues, but will probably <br /> not be the case. Both exports and imports are likely to move lower in December, but by a considerably <br /> smaller amount than in recent months. We expect the December deficit to be between-$38 billion and <br /> -$40 billion. If that is the case, then the trade deficit for all of 2008 will be about-$670 billion which <br /> compares with-$700 billion in 2007. Yet, the annual numbers are misleading when forecasting the 2009 <br /> trade deficit, because in the first half of 2008, the deficit was -$357 billion, while in the second half it is <br /> likely to be only about-$313 billion, with the last two months of the year smaller by far. The bottom line <br /> is that the 2009 trade deficit is likely to be in the vicinity of-$500 billion, and it could be even less. From <br /> an economic growth point of view, the smaller trade deficit is a plus from a real-GDP point of view. <br /> Treasury budget statement(Jan) —The most important part of this release is not the budget deficit for <br /> January, but rather the tax receipts. In January 2008, tax receipts were $255 billion, and we expect the <br /> January 2009 number to be between $220 billion and$225 billion—a reduction of about 12 percent or 13 <br /> percent. Importantly, January is the month where receipts are dominated by estimated individual income <br /> tax payments. This does not send positive signals for the budget outlook. On the spending side for Janu- <br /> ary 2009, outlays appear to have been in the area of$305 billion or$310 billion. If that is the case, then <br /> the deficit for the month was probably about -$90 billion. As a matter of more than passing interest, there <br /> was a surplus of$18 billion in January 2008. <br /> Thursday—February 12th: <br /> Initial unemployment claims (Feb 7t)—Last week, initial unemployment claims jumped to 626,000. <br /> We would not be surprised, however, if a somewhat smaller number is reported for the week ending Feb- <br /> Ortstary 7th—such as between 600,000 and 620,000. Remember, however, that the trend of initial claims is <br /> lill <br /> higher. <br />