My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
07-08-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2024 9:49:38 AM
Creation date
7/8/2024 4:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 8, 2024 2 <br /> voted to approve the projects as proposed and move it to the City Council for discussion and <br /> further direction. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported on April 22, GRG gave a <br /> presentation for the full project proposal and background. Council direction was to bring back <br /> estimated costs for long-term maintenance needs and exact minimum City cash match <br /> requirements and an example of a Natural Resource Management Plan. The estimated <br /> maintenance needs costs and cash match requirements were reviewed with the Council. The <br /> example Natural Resource Management Plan was sent to Council for review prior to the meeting. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained GRG notes that volunteer labor <br /> cannot be counted towards in-kind City match, in previous discussions it was believed that it <br /> could be. Examples of in-kind City labor or contracted services are, but are not limited to, staff <br /> time or Arden Hills contracted activities that accomplish a management task within the acres of <br /> the project that is required for the completion of the project which otherwise would have been <br /> paid for by the grant, such as prairie mowing or woody material removal or disposal. Council <br /> should keep in mind when this project was first introduced, it was under the assumption that <br /> Public Works would be involved very minimally or not at all during the actual remediation <br /> process but would need to plan for the long-term maintenance. If it is Council direction to utilize <br /> Public Works as in-kind labor match during remediation, staff will need to schedule this work <br /> within the annual Public Works Maintenance Plan and will likely cause more items to be <br /> backlogged for repair or maintenance. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen indicated long-term maintenance of the <br /> 26.03 acres will increase the annual maintenance and operations budget. GRG has provided an <br /> estimate for each project site over a span of the first 5 years, the actual amount is not known at <br /> this time. If all project sites are approved and completed, the estimated maintenance costs would <br /> be $12,830 per year on average or $64,150 total over 5 years. The required activities for long- <br /> term maintenance is beyond the Public Works Department's current standard procedures. Public <br /> Works staff also believes that in order to adequately manage this program, it should be by a <br /> person specialized in natural resources. Arden Hills does not currently have a position specifically <br /> for natural resources. <br /> Becca Tucker, GRG, stated she met previously with the Council to discuss potential projects. She <br /> explained after that meeting she met with City staff to address questions that were brought up. <br /> She indicated the dollar match for the projects was discussed, along with the budgets for future <br /> park management. She asked if the Council had any further questions. <br /> Mayor Grant stated it was his understanding the maintenance agreement would remain in place <br /> for 10 years. <br /> Todd Rexine reported this was the case, noting the maintenance agreement would run for 10 <br /> years after the grant was done. <br /> Councilmember Fabel asked if the maintenance agreement was part of the contract with GRG. <br /> Mr. Rexine stated the City would have to maintain the property in good faith at the same level, <br /> with buckthorn removed for 10 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.