My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
07-08-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2024 9:49:38 AM
Creation date
7/8/2024 4:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 8, 2024 6 <br /> and 14 employees were maxed out at this time. She reviewed the current pay grid along with two <br /> separate pay philosophies with the Council and discussed how each would impact the City. She <br /> commented further on several job classification changes that should be made. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned what the average population was to the benchmark communities. He <br /> anticipated the average was much higher than the population of Arden Hills. <br /> City Administrator Perrault reported some of the communities had a population larger than <br /> 10,000 and some were below 10,000. <br /> Mayor Grant commented on how the benchmarks were always shifting and moving based on <br /> where that City may be in their own compensation study. He asked why so many job <br /> classification changes were recommended. <br /> Ms. Melvin stated the last job description classification study was completed in 2014. She <br /> commented further on how jobs had changed and more was being expected of employees in the <br /> past 10 years, especially after COVID. <br /> City Administrator Perrault commented on how staff would be considering changes to the <br /> Public Works department. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau stated she was interested in the cut three/add three steps. She <br /> indicated it may be better to revisit the maintenance workers at a later date along with a <br /> discussion on the Public Works department. <br /> Councilmember Holden indicated she did not have enough information on this. She questioned <br /> how much the levy would have to be increased in year 2, year 3, and year after year. She stated <br /> she would like more information on the overall impacts. She explained at this time she would <br /> support Option 2. <br /> Ms. Melvin stated she could cost out the options for 2026, 2027 and the following years. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated there was not much of a difference from a financial perspective between <br /> Options 1 and 2. He explained at this time, he supported Option 2 and recommended pay <br /> increases be done on anniversary dates and not the first of the year. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated the 3% COLA may not be reality because inflation may be <br /> higher than 3%. <br /> Ms. Melvin commented this was the difference between COLA and a market adjustment. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau asked what the average cost was to replace an employee. <br /> Ms. Melvin estimated this to be $30,000 for training and the overlapping of duties. <br /> Councilmember Fabel stated he was in favor of Option 1. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated Option 2 puts the City at 5% above the market and Option 1 was 8% <br /> above the market. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.