Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 10, 2024 4 <br /> Mayor Grant asked if the developer was going to do the mass grading initially. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated the developer had wanted to do the mass grading, but the County <br /> insisted on doing this work. She questioned how much revenue the County took in from the <br /> timber and dirt that was sold while cleaning the site. <br /> Mayor Grant indicated the County had not provided this information to the City. <br /> 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL <br /> Linda Swanson, 1124 Ingerson Road, stated she reviewed Council Comments from May 28 and <br /> she was shocked by Councilmember Fabel's statement noting she and Mark were "poorly <br /> educated" and "consider the source and the source being what they are". She assured <br /> Councilmember Fabel that she and Mark were not poorly educated. She reminded <br /> Councilmember Fabel that he was to represent Arden Hills residents and not degrade them. She <br /> understood Councilmember Fabel was old, but someday he may learn how to treat people with <br /> social grace. She discussed how the slate has used their quorum status to eliminate duties from a <br /> duly elected mayor. She believed this was disrespectful to the residents that elected him. She <br /> reported Councilmember Holden has been dealing with family medical issues that keep her from <br /> meeting prior to 5:30 p.m., but the slate keeps pushing to set 4:00 or 5:00 p.m. meeting times. She <br /> expressed concern with the fact the slate brought in County sheriffs to escort residents from the <br /> podium. In addition, she was concerned with the fact the slate could not be objective as to why <br /> TCAAP was stalled and placing blame on prior Councilmembers. She suggested the slate speak <br /> with former Councilmembers in order to obtain further history on the TCAAP project. She did not <br /> appreciate the fact the slate would not permit anyone to serve as a Council liaison except the slate. <br /> She understood the slate recommended an increased unit number for TCAAP to the Planning <br /> Commission and without review of the community surveys and feedback. She explained TCAAP <br /> would be a financial risk to the City for the next 20 to 30 years. She stated the Mayor has spoken <br /> to his tenure as Mayor. She then spoke to Councilmember Holden's accomplishments noting she <br /> has brought in millions in State bonding money and has protected the manufactured home <br /> community. She noted Ryan Companies requested Councilmember Holden go to Washington DC <br /> to save the TCAAP project. She stated TCAAP was balanced under the previous Council and not <br /> a major financial risk. She encouraged the slate, before they started pointing fingers, to start <br /> looking at themselves. <br /> Mark Kelliher, 3712 Chatham Court, stated he has been in front of the Council twice in recent <br /> months. He explained he discussed how the Councilmembers who supported 1,960 units within <br /> Rice Creek Commons may have violated their fiduciary responsibilities. More recently, because <br /> of the snarky and disrespectful response he received from Councilmember Fabel, after expressing <br /> his viewpoints. He stated he has since sent Councilmember Fabel an email with a short list of <br /> clear questions that he should have been able to answer if he indeed was following the path of a <br /> fiduciary. He reported Councilmember Fabel's response to the email left him breathless. <br /> Councilmember Fabel refused to answer the questions and instead painted a false picture of the <br /> past. He stated facts were a stubborn thing and unless key facts have been withheld from him, the <br /> Councilmember's attempts to paint a false narrative was disingenuous and misleads the public. <br /> He noted Councilmember Fabel then went on to threaten him with action if he continued to <br /> pursue the truth as Councilmember Fabel found this inconvenient and annoying. He reported <br /> threats like these were attempts to squash his first amendment right to free speech. By threatening <br /> to curtail his right to speak, this Councilmember provided further proof that Councilmember <br />