My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
07-22-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2024 2:03:26 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 9:44:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JUNE 24, 2024 8 <br />sports facility offers advantages that Costco would not offer and if Alatus wants vibrancy in the <br />downtown area, this would provide that though it comes with a price tag. <br />A discussion ensued about what a potential sports facility could include and potential next steps. <br />A discussion ensued regarding potential impacts on zoning, including the JDA's role in the <br />decision making process for a potential sports facility. <br />Council consensus was to direct staff to continue collecting information and to invite the partners <br />that are proposing the sports facility to present to the City Council at a future worksession. Staff <br />was directed to add this to the list of potential future topics. <br />City Administrator Perrault explained possible next steps in moving forward with a potential <br />single hauler for the city. He suggested waiting until the recycling RFP process that is being <br />facilitated by the technical advisor, Foth, is complete before making a decision regarding a single <br />trash hauler. He explained there will be a timing component to implementing a single trash hauler <br />along with a recycling hauler. He reiterated he would prefer to wait to address the single trash <br />hauler issue until a new recycling contract is put in place. <br />Councilmember Holden asked about the planning process and if public engagement would be <br />included. <br />City Administrator Perrault suggested waiting for Foth to provide assistance with the process <br />and noted that public participation could be a component should Council want to include such. <br />Discussion ensued about the options of a referendum or survey regarding a single hauler in order <br />to gauge public interest, road conditions and the effects of multiple haulers versus a single hauler, <br />and Mounds View's experience with the process. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the varying fees that garbage carriers charge and that the State has <br />mandated the process cities must follow during consideration of implementing a single hauler. <br />Councilmember Holden suggested the Council have an internal process figured out prior to <br />engaging the public with a survey. <br />Councilmember Monson asked about timing and if the Council would be in favor of revisiting <br />this topic following completion of the recycling RFP, such as in January. <br />Council briefly discussed the fact that the TCAAP redevelopment will be a single hauler. <br />City Administrator Perrault stated that if Council agreed, staff could bring the process back for <br />discussion following completion of the recycling RFP, so January at the latest, and Council could <br />determine at that time if it wants to pursue a single hauler in 2025 or 2026. <br />Councilmember Holden stated that could work if the recycling contract is for 3 years but not if it <br />is for 5 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.