My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-12-24-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
08-12-24-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2024 12:46:57 PM
Creation date
8/8/2024 12:55:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—AUGUST 12, 2024 6 <br /> Tessia Melvin said no. She would have to cost that out with the Finance Director to project those <br /> costs. Her goal is to figure out the pay philosophy and how fast Council wants to move. Then she <br /> can project all of those costs for budgeting purposes. She said they could project that out for all <br /> four options,but that cost could fluctuate based on new hires and separations. <br /> Mayor Grant also pointed the future cost of living adjustments aren't known so that will change <br /> any projections. <br /> Tessia Melvin added that the step increases happen on anniversary dates. So the budget impact <br /> will be staggered. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated she didn't think it was necessary to go beyond year one as there <br /> is too much movement. She likes Option 1. <br /> Mayor Grant summarized that three members like Option 1, with 2 members preferring Option <br /> 2, with some adjustment. He asked if everyone was okay with having it on the next City Council <br /> agenda. <br /> Councilmember Monson asked if it would be on consent. <br /> Councilmember Holden does not think this item should be on consent. She thinks people should <br /> know that staff are worthy of this pay increase. She thinks there should be a presentation. <br /> Councilmember Fabel agreed because a lot of people don't understand the step and grade, if <br /> they are not in the public sector. <br /> B. Legislative Priorities <br /> Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated that the Council requested to discuss legislative <br /> priorities. She pointed to the most recent Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). In the past Council has <br /> selected projects that they thought were good candidates for state funding. If the Council selects <br /> projects they want to pursue for future state funding, staff requests discussion on priorities. <br /> Interim City Administrator Jagoe pointed out the memo outlined various agreed upon <br /> processes, if the Council wants to mirror similar processes. She noted it is unclear if there will be <br /> a bonding bill next year. The agenda focused on priorities related to bond funding and larger <br /> capital projects. If Council wants to give priority to other legislative priorities staff can pass that <br /> on. Council may also wish to hire an outside lobbyist to assist in obtaining bond funding. <br /> Interim City Administrator Jagoe updated that Council requested that staff invite the state <br /> representatives to attend a future meeting. Those invitations were extended and are scheduled for <br /> the November 251h meeting. She asked for discussion. <br /> Mayor Grant said the memo is written as if 2026 is the bonding year but he thought funds may <br /> be available for 2025. He thinks it's not inconceivable that the legislature will choose to have a <br /> bonding year this year and double up with 2026. <br /> Councilmember Holden thought they will not skip two years. There will be a bonding or cash <br /> bill next year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.