My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
09-09-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2024 11:13:01 AM
Creation date
9/9/2024 10:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 12, 2024 13 <br />Councilmember Monson said we can start with August, do Phase 1 and staff can set the pace as <br />we get into Phase 2. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe confirmed and added the consultants will attend a joint work <br />session in October and can discuss their initial framework and get Council feedback on what else <br />should be looked at in Phase 2. The time frame can be set based on that feedback. <br />Councilmember Monson is fine with the engagement piece, as outlined. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the joint work session is Council and HKGi? <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said it would also involve the planning commission. She said <br />that work session will most likely be the second work session in October. <br />Mayor Grant said when they engage the community he would like them to engage the whole <br />community, not go back just to the planning commission. There needs to be a community wide <br />survey. That is how we'll hear about the issues from the whole community. <br />Councilmember Holden thought inviting former planning commissioners to the work session <br />could be helpful because they are familiar with the different variance issues that should have had <br />ordinances fixed when the variance was granted. The new commission may not have seen a lot of <br />those issues. <br />Mayor Grant agreed. <br />Councilmember Rousseau thought that would be too large of a group who don't regularly work <br />together. She thought Council members could reach out to certain individuals for their ideas and <br />then the Council members could bring that feedback to the work session. <br />Councilmember Monson said that since this is a very controlled effort, she would prefer to stay <br />within the boundaries of the volunteers who are appointed today to do it. She thought a separate <br />email to invite past members to complete the survey may be appropriate but she doesn't support <br />inviting them in and participate on the same level as a current planning commissioner. <br />Councilmember Holden believes that is limiting. You miss out on the experience former <br />commissioners have regarding corner lots, streets, right of way. The campaign is to help eliminate <br />variances. Former planning commissioners have seen examples and know what the issues are. <br />Councilmember Fabel thinks the work session should include the people who are in the <br />positions right now. They can solicit opinions from anyone. The deliberations should include the <br />current planning commissioners. <br />Councilmember Monson agrees the formal deliberations at the work session should be current <br />appointees. Feedback from previous commissioners is welcome but it's not appropriate to bring <br />them into the work session. <br />Councilmember Holden thinks it's important to do this right and get all the information that we <br />can. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.