My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
09-09-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2024 11:13:01 AM
Creation date
9/9/2024 10:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 19, 2024 11 <br />Mayor Grant said it must stay in the enterprise fund. It is possible to move them around and pay <br />back later. But they cannot be used outside of the enterprise funds. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she was recommending moving water funds to sanitary sewer <br />but if there is a payback cost, then that's not ideal. <br />Finance Director Yang stated that would have a cost. You would be borrowing funds from one <br />enterprise to spend it on another. <br />Councilmember Monson doesn't think we should continue to increase prices. <br />Mayor Grant said St. Paul water has sent information that rates will increase as a result of their <br />project. He doesn't believe we've seen what the new rates will be. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said our contract with Roseville expires at <br />the end of this year. He has just started engaging with Roseville. They have provided a rough <br />draft that reflects their new contract with St. Paul. He hasn't had a chance to review that yet. <br />There will be slight increases with the new contract, he doesn't have the exact numbers at this <br />time. <br />Councilmember Monson said she would like to get more information on the water fund to fully <br />understand how that money will be used. Maybe borrowing it to the sanitary sewer fund is not a <br />good idea. However, she is concerned about that much money sitting there. <br />Councilmember Rousseau thought consideration could be given to not increasing the water fund <br />by 3%. <br />Councilmember Monson thought it was probably safe not to bump the water. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the estimate for the replacement water main was on the <br />conservative side. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said he thinks the estimate is right on. <br />Mounds View just did theirs last year and he has been watching it closely. His budget reflects <br />what they just went through. <br />Councilmember Holden thought there is a chance a bid could come in under as this is a <br />competitive project. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed. <br />Councilmember Holden said if we do 9% on the sewer fund, she's comfortable doing 3% or less <br />on the water. We've been fortunate to get all the money from the bonding bill and MNDOT on <br />the water projects. <br />Mayor Grant asked if 9% and 2% are agreeable. <br />Councilmember Holden said the surface water should be 3%. Drudging and cleaning all the <br />ponds is a big project. She would be comfortable with 9% for sanitary sewer, 3% on surface water <br />and 0-1 % on the water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.