CC 10-20-1959 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

... .... ... ,: '":"\ .. - .- .' . .. . . 48 . better than fcur yea:rs. If the sole pw:pos. c.f thiss.wer were to provide adequate .ewage disposal, I would go a long 100% with the Mayor's thoughts but I think we have a milch larger purpose in mind and that is that presently, as far as ...eknow, we have no contamination. WEt're tcldthat by our Health Oftlcer. We know our wells are deeper and the day when we wi11have contamiilation is probably further removed than in an area that has sandy soil and 30 foot wells. Nevertheless, every day a priyate dispos~ system is in operation it's contributing to the overall contamination of Qur village. No other place it can go. It's been pointed out that the cost of community water would cost about $500.00 a lot. I'm no more anxious to have that day arrive in addition to $1,000. for sewer - pay $500 for water and if you're paying $800 . it's 60% of the cost of the sewer anyway illllllediately whether you hook up or nct. Why not pay the ether. 20% and perhaps postpOne the day that we will ever have to have water. I'm going to vote for 1 year hook up, orthereabouts,when that question comes up and not go along with this 4 year idea.. (App !ause) Ml.. PAUL JOHNSON, 1998 Glen Paul Avenue: (Inaudible) - A question about laterals. ....is this based on a certain volume of water or what is it bas.don? AAR. SHORT: The bads for designing the sewen is based\ipon 15 people per acre and I think most of yow: lots are somewhat - probably including the street - will run probably 5 lot& 1:c the acre or something in that nature. Your average population density. according to the planners, run somewhere.round 3 p.rsons per . dwelling - a little bit better in scme a:rell$ or less in others. The volume of sewage calculated per person is 100 gallons per