My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-24-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
09-09-24-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:14:40 PM
Creation date
10/15/2024 2:14:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION— SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 15 <br /> Councilmember Monson would prefer to use funds to help support the personnel costs of the <br /> market adjustment. She wants that to stay under$155,000. She doesn't like the initial calculation <br /> of 20% levy increase. She understands it can be lowered after the preliminary levy approval, but <br /> she would like to lower the preliminary number now, if possible. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked what mandates are unfunded. She reminded there are other <br /> discussions that have not happened. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding what impact it would have if certain items were delayed or removed. <br /> Finance Director Yang summarized that she heard direction to update to reduce the Equipment <br /> and Replacement Fund by $110,000 and $30,000 for the street maintenance program. <br /> Public Works Director and City Engineer Swearingen said he is nearly certain he can reduce <br /> the entire street maintenance program amount to $0. He will just need to make some calculations <br /> based on a bigger project next year. He received the street maintenance condition results. The <br /> City is in really good shape. The Karth Lake neighborhood will be taken care of in 2026 and the <br /> rest of the city is in a maintenance period. <br /> Councilmember Holden would like staffs input on the Comp and Class Study. She is concerned <br /> that Council discussion was one thing and that it seems the direction has changed. She noted some <br /> employees are at the top of their range and other cities are looking for good employees. She asked <br /> if there are any dangers in changing course now. <br /> Public Works Director and City Engineer Swearingen stated that the first option doesn't feel <br /> like there is any immediate benefit. In the past two to three years, the COLA increase has not met <br /> inflation costs. Staff is hopeful that the market study will, at minimum, address the inflationary <br /> piece. With Option 1, Staff will have to wait at least three years before seeing the full benefit. <br /> Option 2 makes the market adjustment. <br /> Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson said she has heard from other cities <br /> that have recently been through this process and some of them feel they are already behind after <br /> two years. The question is if this change will be outdated in two years. <br /> Finance Director Yang said when staff originally saw the proposal there was some excitement <br /> over the possibility of room to grow. She agreed changing to the other option now will not be as <br /> much as they originally expected. The $155,000 amount is adding/dropping three steps and <br /> reclassification based on the market analysis. Using the $124,000 amount defeats the whole <br /> purpose of having a market adjustment because you're being reclassified but then you're being <br /> bumped down steps. <br /> Councilmember Holden was not originally in favor of the $155,000 option but she thinks it's <br /> wrong to pull that back now. <br /> Mayor Grant asked Councilmember Holden if she is in favor of the $155,000. <br /> Councilmember Holden replied no, she isn't. However, that is what was proposed at the last <br /> work session. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.