Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 10 <br /> Councilmember Fabel stated whatever percentage the Council settles on this would be a <br /> preliminary number that could be reduced but could not be increased. He recommended the <br /> Council move forward with the 15.5%preliminary levy at this time in order to have the maximum <br /> amount of flexibility. <br /> Mayor Grant commented on how a reduction in commercial property value shifts the burden of <br /> property taxes to residential property owners and that the pendulum was swinging strongly to fall <br /> on residential. He explained he was unaware of what the County and School Board levy increases <br /> would be. He stated he feared how Arden Hills' taxpayers would be impacted by overall tax <br /> increases. <br /> Councilmember Monson asked if property taxes have swung strongly towards residential <br /> property owners. <br /> Finance Director Yang reported there has been a shift but would not characterize it as strongly. <br /> She commented in the past the levy has been spread between apartments and industrial, but this <br /> has dwindled. <br /> Councilmember Holden recalled Ramsey County Commissioner Victoria Reinhardt had <br /> mentioned there was a significant shift from commercial to residential for property taxes in a <br /> recent article in the Pioneer Press. <br /> Councilmember Fabel stated he understood these were big numbers. He reported he did a quick <br /> analysis and stated even with a 15.5% levy increase, Arden Hills would still be in the lower one- <br /> third of all cities in Ramsey County when it comes to taxes. He stated Arden Hills was a low <br /> taxing city and has been a low spending city. <br /> Councilmember Monson reiterated that this was a preliminary levy and noted she would be open <br /> to a lower rate in December. She stated if a Councilmember had proposed cuts she would be <br /> willing to make considerations. <br /> Councilmember Holden indicated she will lay this information out for the Council in the coming <br /> months but understood at this time there were three Councilmembers that supported the 15.5% <br /> levy increase. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a <br /> motion to adopt Resolution 2024-045 — Setting the Preliminary Lew at 15.5% <br /> for Taxes Payable in 2025. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau indicated if the Council were to move forward with a 13% or 14% <br /> levy increase, she would like to better understand how this would impact the fund balance. <br /> Mayor Grant requested a roll call vote. <br /> A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden <br /> and Mayor Grant opposed). <br /> 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />