Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment C <br />2025 COMPARTATIVE ANALYSIS -PROPER <br />For comparative purposes, the below scenarios provide an estimate of what it would cost a property <br />owner if 1) a franchise fee were imposed or 2) if a property tax levy increase were imposed, in order to <br />generate $395,000 of revenue for the City. The below tables are based on 2025 estimated <br />property tax values. <br />RESIDENTIAL HOMEOWNERS <br />A $480,900 median residential homeowner would see an increase of: <br />• $3.00 per month on their utility bill under an electric -only franchise fee scenario -or- <br />* $9.21 per month on their property tax bill under a bonding scenario, where property taxes are <br />levied to pay back the bond <br />Note: It would cost a residential homeowner a fixed monthly rate of $3.00 for the next <br />15 years. If property taxes were levied, residential homeowners would pay more than <br />$9.21 per month for the next 15 years. Property taxes are based on a homeowner's <br />estimated market value, where valuations are likely to increase year over year. <br />MONTHLY Impact on Homeowners <br />Franchise Fee and/or Property Tax Increase <br />Home <br />Cost per Home - $395,000 <br />Revenue Target <br />2025 Preliminary <br />Market <br />Franchise Fee <br />2025 Property Tax <br />Property Tax (15.5%) <br />Value <br />Electric Only <br />Increase <br />Increase <br />#of Homes <br />%of Homes <br />$ <br />195,100 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 3.35 <br />$ <br />6.27 <br />135 <br />5.1% <br />$ <br />292,700 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 5.37 <br />$ <br />10.17 <br />336 <br />12.7% <br />$ <br />480,900 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 9.21 <br />$ <br />17.62 <br />983 <br />37.1% <br />$ <br />542,100 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 11.03 <br />$ <br />20.76 <br />343 <br />12.9% <br />$ <br />623,400 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 12.94 <br />$ <br />24.46 <br />313 <br />11.8% <br />$ <br />769,300 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 16.37 <br />$ <br />31.11 <br />344 <br />13.0% <br />$ <br />920,700 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 19.95 <br />$ <br />38.01 <br />86 <br />3.2% <br />$ <br />1,027,500 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 22.45 <br />$ <br />42.87 <br />24 <br />0.9% <br />$ <br />2,230,600 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 50.77 <br />$ <br />97.67 <br />79 <br />3.0% <br />$ <br />3,443,700 <br />$ <br />3.00 <br />$ 79.31 <br />$ <br />152.92 <br />6 <br />0.2% <br />Each monthly scenario would generate $395,000 annually <br />1 <br />2,649 <br />100.0% <br />1: In a bonding scenario, the City would generate City revenues to pay back the bond. The <br />payback would include both principal and interest amounts. This bonding scenario assumes a <br />$4.65M bond issued, at a 3.28670% interest rate, paid back over 15 years, with fixed annual <br />payments of $395,000. Total cost to the City is $5,902,755, which includes $1,252,755 of interest <br />costs. <br />MANUFACTURED HOMEOWNERS <br />A $38,100 average manufactured homeowner would see an increase of: <br />• $3.00 per month on their utility bill under an electric -only franchise fee scenario -or- <br />* $1.56 per month on their property tax bill under a bonding scenario, where property taxes are <br />levied to pay back the bond <br />Franchise Fees Page 1 <br />