Laserfiche WebLink
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION – JULY 31, 2024 3 <br />Commissioner Gronquist agreed stating the proper contact name, email or phone number could <br />be requested in that initial call. Commissioner Bonine pointed out that you could follow up with <br />a phone call telling the owner that the flyer was dropped off and request they look at the <br />information and complete the survey. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gronquist stated that the timeline of September and October would be ideal but <br />there is leeway if someone needed to extend into November. Commissioner Bonine agreed. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen highlighted some of the dates on the timeline, noting there were <br />opportunities for informal meetings where staff time and quorum allow, to check in on how the <br />process is going and for redistribution of the lists, if needed. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe suggested commissioners come prepared with their <br />calendars at the August meeting to discuss scheduling for future EDC meetings. Commissioner <br />Bonine thought the August meeting would be collecting the kits to begin the in-person site visits. <br />He didn’t think the September meeting is necessary as there won’t be any new business and <br />commissioners’ time might be better spent completing the site visits. Chair Cupery agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Williams asked if everyone is comfortable using personal email and wondered if <br />there were any open meeting laws that would apply. Commissioner Bonine noted as long as a <br />quorum is not reached it is fine. He reminded about the policy to not “reply all” to avoid any issues. <br />Senior Planner Fransen offered that she could be CC-ed on email if the commissioners think that <br />is helpful. Chair Cupery asked if there was a benefit to creating a general Gmail account that all <br />commissioners had access to. Senior Planner Fransen cautioned each commissioner would have <br />to open and read each email to know if it is a response from someone they contacted. <br />Commissioner Bonine said he believes the majority of responses are going to be obtained through <br />the in-person visits or the provided QR code. <br /> <br />Commissioner Williams sought clarity if the visit results in the commissioner making contact <br />then they would not leave the card. Senior Planner Fransen said the plan is to have enough <br />printed so each business could have one. Businesses could be directed to the website if they have <br />additional information to share. There will also be business resources linked to the website. She <br />noted staff will look into how we can track if a business responded so duplicate attempts aren’t <br />required. This would also be an opportunity to reach back to the business to thank them for <br />completing the survey and ask if the business had anything they would like to discuss. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gronquist and seconded by Commissioner Williams <br />to accept the drafted timeline document. The motion was approved unanimously. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen began the discussion regarding the drafted business visit procedures. She <br />highlighted dates, language and best practices outlined on the document. <br /> <br />Commissioner Williams wondered if tracking who they spoke with would be important. <br />Commissioner Gronquist noted there is no formal guidelines and that commissioners will <br />probably discuss success rates at meetings and check ins but and they will establish their own best <br />practices. Commissioner Bonine said the guideline to make three attempts, as he understands it, <br />is one physical attempt at the business with follow up being phone or email. Vice Chair <br />Subramanian asked if there is a PDF version of the handout that could be attached to a follow up <br />email. Senior Planner Fransen thought that was an option. Commissioner Bonine suggested the