My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-14-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 8:59:49 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 6 <br />Bryce Shearen didn't see any issues with phasing the construction. There would be a savings if <br />both parks are resurfaced at the same time. He thought that phasing could be scheduled in May or <br />June of 2025. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller confirmed that it would be more cost effective to keep <br />the two resurfacing projects together. Those projects could move forward without impacting the <br />footprint of the play structure. <br />Mayor Grant said that would allow progress at each location, so residents are getting something <br />sooner. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the fence could be installed at the same time. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller thought that was a possibility. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how the drainage is at that location. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller said there are a couple of low spots. There has been a <br />little bit of improvement, but not a lot. <br />Councilmember Monson summarized what she heard. Council will green -light Arden Oaks, as <br />defined in the survey, with a possible color change. The City will move forward with the hard <br />court rehab. The play structure at Freeway will be put on hold until the residents can weigh in on <br />if they even want a nature -based structure and then seeing their thoughts after they see what the <br />proposals include for that amount of money. <br />Mayor Grant said there needs to be neighborhood engagement. They have been given the options <br />and they made their selection. The City can't just move forward with installing something <br />completely different. He wondered if the vendors can share some concept designs of other <br />locations where they've done these. Then the public could see examples before having a complete <br />redesign of current proposals. <br />Bryce Shearen said he could ask for examples. A lot of times the vendors want to go through the <br />process of designing something specific to the space. We wouldn't want residents seeing another <br />park concept, using similar features but it cost $300,000. He will reach out to ask the vendors for <br />examples. <br />Mayor Grant said the eventual play structure install will need to be completed without damage to <br />the hard -court surface. <br />Councilmember Monson would be open to Council exploring examples. Then they can <br />determine if it's even worth it to request public opinion if Council determines a suitable nature - <br />based option can't be built for the $150,000. <br />Councilmember Rousseau agreed and would like to have some examples brought to the next <br />work session for Council to discuss. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.