Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 16 <br />is in really good shape. The Karth Lake neighborhood will be taken care of in 2026 and the rest of <br />the city is in a maintenance period. <br />Councilmember Holden would like staff s input on the Comp and Class Study. She is concerned <br />that Council discussion was one thing and that it seems the direction has changed. She noted some <br />employees are at the top of their range and other cities are looking for good employees. She asked <br />if there are any dangers in changing course now. <br />Public Works Director and City Engineer Swearingen stated that the first option doesn't feel <br />like there is any immediate benefit. In the past two to three years, the COLA increase has not met <br />inflation costs. Staff is hopeful that the market study will, at minimum, address the inflationary <br />piece. With Option 1, Staff will have to wait at least three years before seeing the full benefit. <br />Option 2 makes the market adjustment. <br />City Clerk Hanson said she has heard from other cities that have recently been through this <br />process and some of them feel they are already behind after two years. The question is if this <br />change will be outdated in two years. <br />Finance Director Yang said when staff originally saw the proposal there was some excitement <br />over the possibility of room to grow. She agreed changing to the other option now will not be as <br />much as they originally expected. The $155,000 amount is adding/dropping three steps and <br />reclassification based on the market analysis. Using the $124,000 amount defeats the whole <br />purpose of having a market adjustment because you're being reclassified but then you're being <br />bumped down steps. <br />Councilmember Holden was not originally in favor of the $155,000 option but she thinks it's <br />wrong to pull that back now. <br />Mayor Grant asked Councilmember Holden if she is in favor of the $155,000. <br />Councilmember Holden replied no, she isn't. However, that is what was proposed at the last <br />work session. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the levy has been reduced by 4%. <br />Councilmember Monson summarized the changes discussed. Removing the street maintenance <br />program saves 2%. Removing the permit software would lower the levy by 1%. The change to the <br />Equipment budget would be another 2%. She said total cuts are 5% and if Council chooses to <br />move forward with implementing the Public Works staff mid -year, instead of at the first of the <br />year, there would be additional savings there. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the Public Works staff savings was worth it. She said staff <br />already doesn't have the capacity. A member of the public will have to negotiate the Great River <br />Greening contract. She doesn't think that's appropriate. She didn't vote to approve the $2 for a <br />lead position but she wants to discuss that tonight. That person could oversee this contract. It <br />should not be a member of the public. She would propose the Lead Parks position be approved <br />now. <br />