10-14-24-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 10 Mr. Fink stated the church has been very gracious and cooperative when it comes to the timing of this project. He indicated he would go back and review the contractual agreement with the church to ensure he was still in compliance with the timing change. He explained there was a possibility this would still work out, otherwise he would have to request additional flexibility from the church. Councilmember Monson reported she did not want to put this project at risk, if the developer was supposed to meet certain milestones. Mr. Fink stated it was his understanding the next round of applications would include a final plat, vacation of easements, site plan or development plan and the rezoning. Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported this was the case, along with a conditional use permit for the multi -family dwelling and a PUD. Mr. Fink stated adding one more application to this next round should not change the timing for this project. Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated this was correct. She indicated it seems clean to table the rezoning, if the City can get consent from the applicant to extend beyond the 120 days. Councilmember Rousseau questioned if the noise and quality of life issue would be addressed by the developer. Mr. Fink commented since the Planning Commission meeting, he engaged a qualified sound consultant to conduct noise studies on County Road 96 and Highway 10. He hoped to have the results from this study by the end of the month. Mayor Grant discussed the location of the proposed building and asked if the church would be using any of the parking adjacent to the proposed building. Mr. Fink stated this was not his intention. Further discussion ensued regarding the constraints on the property in terms of the overall footprint. Councilmember Holden asked which page has the drainage grading information. Senior Planner Fransen reported this information was available on Page C7. Councilmember Holden questioned how many feet above Highway 10 would this property be built. Mr. Fink indicated he could not answer this. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated the elevation at the of the highway was 912 and the western portion of the building would have an elevation of 922.