My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-14-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 8:59:49 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 9 <br />Councilmember Monson said we would need to have the public hearing and vote in October. <br />Mayor Grant said the 90-day period is an Xcel requirement. <br />Mike Wilhelmi said it is required by Xcel and the PUC for processing. Bill notices go out to <br />customers, so they aren't surprised when they see the fee. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said the item could be brought back on the October 14 Work <br />Session for final direction. That would allow time for the 10-day posting, get it on the agenda for <br />October 28. If there is direction for a public hearing that could be noticed as part of the entire <br />agenda item. That would reach that targeted November 1 deadline. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked what happens if there is a public hearing and the public <br />dissuades Council from moving forward with franchise fees. What would need to be done with the <br />tax levies? <br />Mayor Grant said we would be beyond the point to change it. <br />Councilmember Monson said it's not in the preliminary levy. She said Council would have to set <br />the prelim levy to a point that assumes franchise fees won't be used. This is not a palatable choice <br />since they worked so hard to bring that preliminary levy amount down. She thought maybe it's a <br />false public hearing if the prelim levy doesn't include it. <br />Councilmember Holden disagrees. She said there has been an open house, it's been discussed, it <br />was in the newsletter. The public hearing is the opportunity to explain that we are going to charge <br />them the equivalent of a cup of coffee a month vs. $100 annually. <br />Mayor Grant said it would be the opportunity to explain to residents what has transpired since <br />the open house, share the information from Xcel and outline the plans, moving forward. He wants <br />residents to know Council wants to hear from them. He said it's not a yes or no public hearing. <br />Councilmember Monson said she is comfortable tailoring the public hearing that way. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said it makes more sense to have a presentation that outlines why <br />Council made the decision. <br />Mayor Grant said any decision on a course of action should be included in Arden Hills Notes. <br />Public engagement is important. He pointed out that residents will be getting a top-notch fire <br />station in our community. <br />Councilmember Holden said it can lower their ISO for home insurance because the response <br />time will be significantly better. <br />Councilmember Monson said Xcel Energy has to find ways to decarbonize their natural gas <br />business. One of the ways they are doing that is pilot projects. One of the proposed projects is a <br />district geo-thermal system estimated to be around $10 million. Rice Creek Commons is a <br />fantastic opportunity. You have to win an RFP to get that investment into the community. She <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.