Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> '. , <br /> . Guard had already indicated they were not interested in a land swap. Mr. Clark <br /> responded that the Army actually owns the land, and without the swap the primer tracer <br /> area of the property is essentially land locked without access. Ms. Wolfe noted that the <br /> discussion with Army/National Guard needs to be broader than strictly the land swap, but <br /> rather a discussion regarding access and how to potentially alter borders so that access <br /> works and the primer tracer area becomes viable. <br /> Councilmember Rem left the meeting at 9: 15 p.m. <br /> Councilmember Holden voiced a concern regarding how attorney's time will be tracked. <br /> How would we determine, for example, whether Mr. Comadeca's time is for the Ctiy or <br /> for the developer, and whether it is reimbursable under certain terms of the development <br /> agreement? Mr. Clark answered that expenses and the nature of the work would be <br /> carefully tracked and monitored as it is now. Ms. Wolfe noted that perhaps as the <br /> transition is made to a new agreement that specific language should be made clearer. <br /> There was discussion about site characterization. Councilmember Holden indicated that <br /> she thought site characterization was the developer's responsibility from the beginning. <br /> Both Ms. Wolfe and Mr. Clark indicated that they did not believe this was the case per <br /> the first Interim Development Agreement. Councilmember Grant stated that he believed <br /> it was something they were going to cover all along, but suggested that staff review the <br /> agreement and respond back to Council at a later date. <br /> . David McClung, a resident in the audience, asked if the one-year effectiveness ofthe <br /> appraisal was a statutory requirement or something covered in federal regulations. He <br /> suggested that if it was the latter it might be negotiable. Mr. Clark indicated that he <br /> would have to research that question. <br /> Councilmember Grant requested that the calendar/task list be incorporated into a flow <br /> chart. It would be helpful, he stated, to see what things must precede others. <br /> Mr. Clark stated that in order to proceed with this project, and the required additional <br /> investment, there is a need to have a firmer commitment from the City to CRR, especially <br /> regarding financial or public assistance. Mr. Grant responded that it would be easier to <br /> discuss if there was some indication of a dollar range. Mr. Clark stated that he hopes to <br /> have a range to discuss in approximately three weeks. The city's financial consultant is <br /> working on some scenarios based on the current drall framework plan and other <br /> assumptions. This will change as more is learned and decided about the project. <br /> Councilmember Grant requested that staff and the development team keep the Council <br /> "out in front" and not behind as this project and related discussions progress. <br /> Ms. Wolfe asked ifthere is a commitment by the City Council to try to attain the June <br /> deadline. There was further discussion to clarify the various items on the calendar/task <br /> list. <br /> . <br /> 2 <br />