My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
10-28-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 9:18:36 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 9:02:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — OCTOBER 14, 2024 3 <br />Finance Director Yang said Mike Wilhelmi can help answer any specific questions regarding <br />rate options, structure or implementation. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the options provided are the only options. <br />Mike Wilhelmi said the council has a wide variety of options. These options were selected based <br />on previous discussions. He noted Option B in each of the scenarios is a neutral option for rate <br />payor types. Option A will place more of the burden toward the large C&I customers. Option C <br />would be residential customers paying more of the overall burden. He noted each option produces <br />about the same revenue. These were the options he chose to present. Xcel Energy has no position <br />on if franchise fees should be used or on the amounts. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the option would have to be approved by the Public Utilities Commission <br />(PUC). <br />Mike Wilhelmi said when the City and Xcel reach an agreement it will need to be filed with the <br />PUC. That would give them the authority to levy the taxes on behalf of the City. Then Xcel would <br />collect the money and give it to the City on a quarterly basis. <br />Councilmember Holden said it was brought up that non -profits are being asked to pay a majority <br />of this. That was not the intent. She said Land O Lakes already pays property tax. She asked if <br />40% of their tax already goes towards police and fire. Finance Director Yang confirmed. <br />Councilmember Holden said if Land O Lakes is already paying a big share for the fire <br />department. She said North Heights isn't paying and Presbyterian Homes and Health Partners are <br />big users of the fire department and don't pay anything. She said, knowing that the commercial <br />properties already pay a large amount of their property tax towards the fire department, she <br />doesn't have a problem with charging the non -profits a small amount for it. She's okay with the <br />$3,000. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said that was one of the reasons the decision was made to stick with <br />funding just the fire department and not try to include bonding for the trails. This is separated <br />differently than a tax levy is. This gives it a more even spread. She said previously there was <br />interest in looking at a 15-year and hoping to pay it off early if Rice Creek Commons goes <br />forward there would be more electric users. She is interested in talking about the 15-year under <br />Option A-2 with the $395,000 every year. <br />Councilmember Holden agreed. It's an extra half a million dollars going from a 15-year to 20- <br />year, in interest alone. <br />Mayor Grant said the 20-year is out of the question for him. The total interest on a 20-year is <br />huge. He thinks we'd be better off to scale it back to 15 years, maybe even 10 years. <br />Councilmember Monson is okay with the 15-year option. Her question is if the 15-year is <br />selected, do we want to match the franchise fee to the payment, or do we want to have a higher <br />franchise fee to help pay it off faster. If interest rates go down, refinancing could be an option. She <br />supports Option A-2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.