Laserfiche WebLink
Comparison of North Elevations —Approved v. Proposed <br />-o. <br />INVNAI <br />�1 I <br />0...F%iEOR ROE,FVATO,-EVEN!WA & <br />i �r.ra <br />u <br />mPa <br />yNORTH'PRIOR ELEVATION-EVENTSPACE <br />1/B". 15 <br />n NORTH E%TERIOR ELEVATION- LOBBV <br />1/8'=1.0. <br />The Subject Property has existing flexibility as part of the previous PUD from the requirements <br />for transparent windows required in Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F. <br />The site as proposed in this application conforms with the approved PUD in terms of building <br />positioning, lighting, site furnishings, screening, landscaping, snow storage, parking setbacks, <br />number of parking stalls, the traffic study and site circulation, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, <br />freestanding signs, and wall signs. <br />!.l CANOPY SOUTH <br />- <br />114' = 1 F <br />T <br />*ELEGANT <br />EVENT COfM <br />NPMWIWY-NP-,2fIMIW � <br />�CANOPV-EAST <br />114" = P-P <br />3. Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications —Section 1355.04 <br />A public hearing for a PUD Amendment request is required before the request can be brought <br />before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear <br />before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. <br />Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the <br />Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and <br />recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />