My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
11-12-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 10:32:22 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 10:26:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION — OCTOBER 15, 2024 6 <br />work session proves to be difficult, it might change her view. She would like to shoot for the third <br />Monday of the month and establish a schedule, that would be great. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how long it took to arrange the meeting tonight. It didn't take a <br />year. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe thought it was September. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said there is an issue with the code of conduct for committees that <br />was identified in January and the discussion still has not happened. In April or May the City <br />Administrator requested one, as well. There is a pattern. <br />Councilmember Holden said Council had the opportunity to move that item to a work session <br />and no one did. <br />Mayor Grant said Council needs to focus on getting it done, not on what has happened in the <br />past. <br />Councilmember Monson said for scheduling work sessions, she's looking at the list, it can <br />probably be split in half and schedule two work sessions in October and early November. If the <br />desire is to do a work session prior to negotiations, she would want a weekly cadence starting <br />next week. The developer is keen on having discussions on the Term Sheet. <br />Mayor Grant thinks it needs to be faster than that. He thinks it should be no more than two work <br />sessions and the procedure for the negotiations needs to be decided. <br />Councilmember Fabel thinks the first meeting with Bob Lux won't necessarily be a give and <br />take, it will be more of a touch base to determine where we start from. He thinks there should be a <br />meeting with the developer to determine where we are. <br />Mayor Grant reminded the Term Sheet is only an agreement between the City and Bob Lux. The <br />County is not included but the County has requested that we take this step so the process can <br />move forward. <br />Councilmember Holden said Council needs to know what the priorities are going to be. Is it the <br />civic site or the pocket parks or something else? The negotiators need to know what the City's <br />priorities are. They aren't all equal in her mind. <br />Discussion ensued regarding how many work session meetings are needed and how often. <br />Stacie Kvilvang said nothing has changed. The developer and the County want to know if this <br />Council still wants the things that are on the current Term Sheet. The big discussion is going to be <br />TIF because that changes with the financials. <br />Councilmember Monson thinks it is clear that what is in the Term Sheet is not going to change <br />and she agrees that the larger discussion will be surrounding TIF and what will that mean for all <br />the other pieces. Costs have gone up. Overall, she doesn't know why anything would change in <br />terms of the core goal. She thinks it would be valuable to have a separate discussion regarding the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.