My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
11-12-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 10:32:22 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 10:26:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — OCTOBER 28, 2024 2 <br />Jason Zimmerman said as part of Phase 1, HKGi provided an introduction and overview to the <br />City Council at a work session; met with City staff to discuss their recent experiences working <br />with the zoning code; toured the city; and reviewed plans, studies, and documents related to <br />zoning and development. This provided the consultants with an understanding of the structure and <br />application of the existing zoning and subdivision regulations. <br />In Phase 2, HGKi mapped the zoning districts to help assess their consistency with the adopted <br />land use plan; reviewed the existing zoning code; and evaluated the overall structure and <br />organization. Members of the City Council and Planning Commission were provided an <br />opportunity to take an online survey to share their thoughts about the current code and issues <br />related to development. <br />The City of Arden Hills sought a review and update of the zoning and subdivision chapters of its <br />City Code to remove inconsistencies, improve formatting, review standards, insert illustrative <br />graphics, and explore new ideas and City Council priorities for inclusion. Upon evaluation, HKGi <br />identified eight areas to be addressed as part of the update project: <br />1. Restructure code for better access to information. <br />2. Simplify code for ease of use: remove repetitive language, add illustrations, create tables in <br />place of text, etc. <br />3. Address missing or dated provisions. <br />4. Eliminate infrequently used zoning districts and consolidate similar ones. <br />5. Modify site dimension standards to reduce common variance requests. <br />6. Add options to address a lack of missing middle housing. <br />7. Incorporate standards to respond to new trends and technologies such as EV charging, reduced <br />parking requirements, sustainable and resilient design and construction, etc. <br />8. Streamline processes for review of land use development proposals. <br />Kendra Ellner said the current structure of the zoning chapter has become less organized and <br />more challenging to work with as it has been amended over time. Similar types of information are <br />segregated into different sections of the code, and a lack of hierarchy makes finding requirements <br />quickly difficult. An Appendix contains specific procedures and application requirements for <br />various land use approvals. The Subdivision Chapter contains six sections and is generally well - <br />structured. HGKi recommends creating new sections specifically to cover Park Dedication and <br />Definitions so that this information can be found more quickly and easily by City staff and the <br />public. <br />The Zoning chapter contains 16 sections, and there is a lack of organization or hierarchy. HKGi <br />recommends rearranging the order to allow the code to logically build from the base districts up <br />through the more detailed aspects of use and performance standards, ending with administration <br />and procedures. Definitions should be in its own section for easier reference. <br />The update will not address or modify the newer Section 1380, which covers the TCAAP <br />Redevelopment Code. <br />Throughout the subdivision and zoning chapters, language is repeated in different sections, <br />adding to the length of the text and de-emphasizing the important information that may be buried <br />within other standards. The codes lack simple and effective illustrations and tables that can also <br />help reduce the amount of text used to describe various requirements. Information that is currently <br />provided as text may be better shared through tables or charts. All these changes make the codes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.