My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
11-12-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2024 10:32:22 AM
Creation date
11/13/2024 10:26:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION — OCTOBER 15, 2024 4 <br />Mayor Grant wants to be sure he has the most current versions of everything. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said the option agreement for the civic site, the MOU for the <br />parks, the cooperative agreement have not changed. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if the green energy is a new item. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe said that will be new but that has previously been identified <br />as one of the development agreement items to be drafted. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if it was just the old agreements from before the lawsuit. She <br />asked for clarification if Staff is asking Council to look at those agreements and reaffirm, noting <br />there may be some changes because the purchase agreement has changed. The purchase <br />agreement is no longer phased so some things will be different. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe confirmed. Any changes to the cooperative agreement would <br />be changing dates. There has been no direction to change any of the original content. <br />Mayor Grant said we have to sit down and negotiate with Alatus. He asked Council how they <br />want to handle that. <br />Councilmember Fabel outlined the current Term Sheet was created by two councilmembers <br />working with Alatus. Those two councilmembers brought the document back to Council and it <br />was adopted. He thinks it makes sense for the two councilmembers to begin with the document <br />we have and if there are terms that Council doesn't want included anymore or if there is <br />something Council wants added, the councilmembers involved in the negotiations can bring those <br />forward. <br />Councilmember Holden said it wasn't only two members who were negotiating. She said <br />everyone was at the table negotiating at different times. They made sure everyone's opinion was <br />included. <br />Councilmember Monson asked Interim City Administrator Jagoe to confirm who the two <br />primary councilmembers were who participated in previous negotiations and if they were the JDA <br />members in 2022. <br />Interim City Administrator Jagoe recalls the primary discussions included the two JDA <br />representatives and former City Administrator Perrault met individually with the other <br />councilmembers to go over the discussion items. The primary discussions with the developer <br />occurred with the two JDA representatives. <br />Councilmember Monson said she is fine with continuing that structure for negotiations. <br />Councilmember Rousseau wondered if the 2 or 3 special work sessions Staff is requesting are <br />intended to be held before going into the negotiations with the developer. <br />Mayor Grant believes so. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.