My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-24-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC 01-24-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:11 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 12:08:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated that she is looking for a landscaping plan that is fairly inexpensive with <br />very little maintenance, <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden suggested that perennials be planted on the City Hall property and not in <br />the median area, <br /> <br />Councilmembers requested that URS create a new set of landscaping plans for CSAH 96 that <br />incorporates the alternative one and group B planting arrangement for an estimated cost of <br />$135,000, <br /> <br />Countv Road E Pedestrian Bridl!:e and Sidewalk Improvements <br /> <br />City Engineer Greg Brown reported to the City Council that the City was not awarded grant <br />funding by MnDOT for the proposed County Road E sidewalk improvement project. The City <br />Engineer received verbal notification from MnDOT that the County Road E project was <br />reviewed along with 35 other projects and was given a priority ranking of 14th The top ten <br />projects were approved for MnDOT grant funding with the next four being considered as <br />alternates for funding if one or more of the top ten projects are not completed or cancelled, <br />According to MnDOT staff, it is very unlikely that the County Road E sidewalk project will <br />receive funding at this time, <br /> <br />The following options were reviewed by the City Council: <br />1. Proceed with the north sidewalk along the bridge to Old Highway 10 using state aid <br />funds for construction ($350,000) and local funds for engineering/inspection ($115,000), <br />2, Proceed with the north sidewalk along the bridge only using state aid funds for <br />construction ($200,000) and local funds for engineering/inspection ($66,000), <br />Construction in later 2005, <br />3, Wait and see if other projects drop out of the program allowing this project to be partially <br />funded by MnDOT, Reapply for next year's program and begin construction in 2006, <br />4, Proceed with the south sidewalk along the bridge to Old Highway 10 using state aid <br />funds for construction ($190,000) and local funds for engineer/inspection ($60,000), <br />Begin construction in late 2005, This option would require a new resolution by the City <br />Council. <br />5, Proceed with the south sidewalk along the bridge only using state aid funds for <br />construction ($130,000) and local funds for engineering/inspection ($40,000), <br />Construction would begin in late 2005, This option will require a new resolution by City <br />Council. <br /> <br />City Engineer Brown noted that state aid is scheduled to be used as a funding mechanism for the <br />Red Fox/Grey Fox and Lexington Avenue projects in 2005, The City would have to change its <br />funding sources for a number of other projects in order to utilize state aid funding for this <br />proj ect, <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that URS has contacted the residents on the north side of County Road E, <br />Three residents have responded back to URS regarding the proposed project, <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.