My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-24-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC 01-24-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:11 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 12:08:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />right-of-way to the east of the pedestrian Way, The resident has essentially adopted the land and <br />has maintained the area as his own for the past 28 years, <br /> <br />Typically lots that are designated as R-l are supposed to have minimum dimensions of95 feet by <br />130 feet and 14,000 square feet of area, Front dimensions for this property are 83 feet and do not <br />meet the City's current standards, City staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding <br />whether or not the City should vacate this piece of property, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the City currently owns the property, <br /> <br />City Planner Peter Hellegers stated that the property was dedicated to the City on the plat. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked if this piece of property is in addition to the existing right-of-way <br />along Lexington Avenue, <br /> <br />City Planner Hellegers said that this piece of property is in addition to the existing right-of-way, <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson said that he is very reluctant to vacate this picce of property, <br /> <br />Mayor Applikowski asked staff members if a variance is necessary for this property, <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated that tec1mically a variance would be necessary to remedy the non- <br />conformity of the lot in meeting the City's current R-l requirements, <br /> <br />Mr. Len Gallus (1104 Amble Drive) stated that his lot is grossly undersized in comparison to the <br />other homes in his neighborhood due to the 10 foot Pedestrian Way easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson said that he is sympathetic to Mr. Gallus situation, but the City cannot <br />address all of the residential home owner issues in the City, <br /> <br />Mr. Gallus questioned why the City issued the original building permit in 1977, Why was the <br />original permit approved ifit did not meet the R-l standards? <br /> <br />City Planner Hellegers stated that it is possible that the City Codes have changed over time <br />making this property non-conforming to today's R-I zoning district. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked if the City has any other Pedestrian Ways, <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers said that the City has a Pedestrian Way near Colleen Avenue and Norma Avenue, <br />The pedestrian ways are dedicated to the City through platting, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the City would benefit at all if this property is vacated, <br /> <br />City Planner Hellegers stated that the City has not used the property for 28 years, but it may be <br />beneficial for the City to hold onto the property in the event that it necessary for future road or <br />infrastructure improvements, <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.