My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-11-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC 04-11-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:12 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 12:08:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />APRIL 11,2005 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />which criteria would minimized the risk to the City of Arden Hills and he would support <br />adoption ofthis policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if this EDC recommendation would become a City policy. He <br />indicated it would and this would guide the financing of the development and it would form the <br />basis for negotiations with the developer to construct the business terms for this development, <br />which would form the foundation of those discussions. He stated this was a major policy and <br />probably one of the more important policies the City has or might ever adopt. He stated the <br />alternative was that the City could elect to not do the project, in which case the GSA would put <br />the project up for public auction and it would be difficult to say who would buy it and the City <br />would need to control the development through the Codes and the City would be unable to <br />design what they wanted on this development. He stated ultimately, they ended up with a <br />community based plan. He indicated at this point he did not want to tie the negotiating team with <br />the developer, so he would not object to the bonding language. He asked if this document would <br />be used for the smaller TIF districts used for the next 26 years. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang replied they were looking at the development in full and they intended on working <br />with the Council to get these things resolved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated they had already identified that there was a public financing <br />need and by passing this they were approving public financing, even though they were not <br />specifically approving the public financing tonight. She expressed concern of the real interest to <br />the current taxpayers of Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she would vote for this as written, but she would have preferred to <br />have addressed the operational costs and this was an important next step to get tbem to where <br />they needed to go. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />B. TCAAP VERBAL UPDATE <br /> <br />Mr. Clark updated the Council on recent TCAAP developments and upcoming events. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if there was any update on the wildlife corridor and the sports <br />field. Mr. Clark replied they had discussed the sports field today and this was a slow process, <br />but it was progressing. With respect to the wildlife corridor, no discussions had taken place yet. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated she had received a suggestion that they incorporate the word "Prairie" <br />into the description of this property. She asked all residents to make any suggestions for this <br />area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.