My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-11-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC 04-11-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:12 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 12:08:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />APRIL I I, 2005 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />be able to turn in the cul-de-sac. He indicated street parking would be allowed on Red Fox with <br />no parking on Dunlap or Grey Fox. <br /> <br />Mr. Ritt asked if they could not condemn property along the roadside for the pond and keep <br />everything else the way it was. Mr, Brown noted this area rose very steeply and when they were <br />dealing with water, they would be building a pond in ground that was higher than the <br />surrounding area, He noted they would also need to install a large wall with this suggestion, <br />which would be expensive, He stated the proposed pond would be grading a little bit into that <br />slope, but not right into the building. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked for clarification on the mailing of the notice. Steve Ritt, Co-owner <br />1350 Grey Fox Road, stated someone in his cOlmnercial brokerage firm had faxed him the <br />information after the March 21 hearing and therefore they never had any say for the proj ect. He <br />indicated he contacted the City and changed the address at that time and addressed his concerns <br />as to why they were not notified. He stated the address they sent the address to was 1578 <br />University and that business did not forward the letter to them for at least a month. <br /> <br />John Comalo, rcpresentative of eight properties in the area, stated he was in approval of the <br />project, but asked for an explanation of the assessments, Mr. Siddiqui replied they would have <br />30 days from today to pay the assessment in full and if they chose not to pay it in full they could <br />spread the cost of mill and overlay for five years and for reconstruction for ten years, with <br />interest. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m, <br /> <br />Mr. Filla asked for the property which had not received the notice, what process did the City <br />follow for notices. Mr. Moore replied that staff sent the first notice to an address they had <br />received from Ramsey County. When that notice was returned, staff then sent the notice to the <br />utility billing address, He noted this was a standard process that staff followed. it was only after <br />they received the correct address from the property owner, that they changed their records to that <br />address. <br /> <br />John Ritt asked if Council could hold off making a decision on this for a couple of weeks until <br />they had the opportunity to look at this in more detail, <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski replied she did not believe they could hold the project because it was on a <br />time schedule. <br /> <br />Council member Holden stated she would not change the way she voted because they had <br />looked at different options and she believes this is the best option for the area. <br /> <br />John Ritt asked what options he had since they did not receive sufficient notice. Mr. Filla <br />replicd if they wanted to appeal this, they needed to object to this in writing at tonight's meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.