My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 08-08-2005 (2)
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC 08-08-2005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:14 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 12:08:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />AUGUST 8, 2005 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />bid amount of $1,375,247.66. The low bid was approximately $35,000 greater than the <br />Engineer's estimate. <br /> <br />He recommended the award of the 2005 Pavement Management Program to Amt Construction <br />Company, Inc. for the total amount of$I,375,247.66. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what was happening with the Xcd Energy parking issues in this <br />area. Mr. Brown replied Xcel Energy had begun some of the work that was being done in <br />conjunction with Qwest. The main parking issue was with East Side Beverage and they had <br />prepared a draft scheme to get parking on their site. He stated East Side Beverage needed to <br />finalize their parking and they were looking at possibly using some of Smith's parking across the <br />street. With respect to Intemational Paper, the project as is, included the removal of the frontage <br />road on the west side ofInternational Paper and they want to shorten Fox Road, which would take <br />some property of Intemational Paper and they were working with them on a purchase of this land. <br />He noted this purchase would be of benefit to the City, but it was possible to also do the project as <br />is, and if they could not reach a mutual agreement, they would proceed with the project as <br />proposed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if there was a poor bidding environment at the current time <br />because all of the bids came in over estimate. Mr. Brown replied unfortunately inflation was <br />catching up and generally when they had a lot of bids and they were in a fairly tight pattem, he felt <br />it was a good representation of the market at this time and it was an underestimate on his part by <br />not catching up with the current costs of construction. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a <br />motion to award the 2005 Pavement Management Program bid to Amt <br />Construction Company, Inc. in the total amount of $1,375,247.66. The <br />motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson moved to instruct <br />staff to adjust the CIP budget by an increase of $80,000.00. The motion <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />B. Extension of Roval Oaks Purchase Al!reement <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated on July 18, 2005, the City Council voted three to two to approve the Planned <br />Unit Development and related documents for the Royal Oaks condominium office park located at <br />the old City Hall site at the southwestern quadrant of Hamline A venue and Highway 96. Since <br />the P1auned Unit Development required four votes to affirm, the project was denied. Due to this <br />action staff is seeking direction from the Council on how to proceed with the disposal of the <br />property. He indicated there appeared to be three general options: Do nothing for a selected <br />period of time; renegotiate with Royal Oaks regarding a new purchase agreement; or start a new <br />sales process which could include a request for proposal, marketing by signage and/or contacting <br />selected developer/brokers as appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.