My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-12-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC 09-12-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:11:14 PM
Creation date
11/9/2006 12:08:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />tough one and knowing there are not easy answers. He noted he had looked at the Ramsey County <br />and Roseville pursuit policies. He stated there does not appear to be any uniformity between <br />police jurisdictions. He questioned whether or not there was some value in having a unifoml <br />policy that would be adopted statewide. Hc noted the entire situation was a lot different in the <br />metro area now compared to the way the area was 20 or 30 years ago when the area was more <br />rural and he believed a police pursuit was a much more dangerous proposition in today's world. <br />He asked if it was wise not having a pursuit policy that did not spell out parameters. Bob <br />Fletcher, Ramsey County Sheriff, stated he has been involved in over 100 pursuits in the course <br />of his career with none of them resulting in serious bodily harm. He noted apprehensions from <br />pursuits were happening on a daily basis without any injury. He indicated the "bad" guys were <br />going to jail because of these pursuits with very few injuries. He stated about six years ago a <br />uniform pursuit policy was put in place and every police agency was required to adopt the policy <br />with some exceptions. He indicated they were continually looking at this as law enforcement <br />professionals and they took the pursuit policy very seriously. He believed they were able to train <br />officers to understand where the balance was. He stated it appeared they had three choices - They <br />have a policy which allowed people to chase indiscriminately; a policy that said nobody can be <br />chased; or they attempt to draft guidelines to address pursuits. He stated without being allowed to <br />pursue, there would be no incentive for anyone to stop. He noted they could not go that far. He <br />indicated they needed to balance the policy with the perpetrators. He stated the key was to have <br />competent, qualified, and professional officers who had the best interest of the community in <br />mind. He noted they have never had a life threatening injury in the 12 years he has been with the <br />Sheriff s Department. He stated they were open to engaging in a discussion with the Cities in <br />Ramsey County as to where the threshold should be when there was a pursuit. He noted there <br />were times when actual pursuit was safer than not pursuing. He believed they have struck the <br />proper balance and he believed their pursuit policy was more defined than Roseville's pursuit <br />policy. He stated their supervisors were very prone to curtailing the pursuit and many times <br />pursuits were ended by the Sergeant. He noted they have had pursuit training in the past three <br />years to have officers disengage the emotion of a pursuit. He stated they have had an excellent <br />track record. He indicated there was always a supervisor listening in to the radio communications <br />and that supervisor had the authority to call of any pursuit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson agreed the Ramsey County Sheriffs Department had better pursuit <br />language than the City of Roseville's pursuit policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked what was the criteria for which intersections get Opticons Sheriff <br />Fletcher replied in his opinion, all intersections should get them, but the reality was it came down <br />to who paid for the Opticons <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if there were similar thresholds for when sirens and lights should <br />be used in responding to a call. Sheriff Fletcher statcd when the standards were adopted, siren <br />and lights were not part of the standards, but the general standard for red lights and sirens is when <br />a person's life is in danger. He noted a crime in progress or the likelihood of a crime in progress <br />would justify red lights and sirens. He indicated, however, that when red light and sirens are used <br />this does not necessarily mean that speed is accelerated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.