CC 09-12-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 7 Councilmember Larson stated he believed the Planning Commission could give this more deliberate thought. He stated he was not suggesting they do an entirely new PUD, but he did want the Planning Commission to review this and in the interim what they had before them still applied and they could still use that as a marketing tool. Mayor Aplikowski asked what changes were proposed for the PUD conditions? Mr. Hellegers stated at this time staff was not asking for any changes to the conditions. Mayor Aplikowskl stated she did not believe this was fair to the applicant that they go back to the beginning and start the process again. Councilmember Larson stated he did not intend for the applicant to start this process over, but he still believed the Planning Commission should look at this again. Councilmember Holden stated both the Planning Commission and the Council would see the final plan anyway and she did not want to do double work. Councilmember Holden called the question. Councilmember Larson opposed). The cal1 on the question carried (3-1 MOTION: Mayor Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve Chesapeake Companies the requested one-year extension to submit a Final Plan PUD no later than September 24, 2006, subject to the applicant continuing to abide by the 14 existing conditions of approval as noted in staffs September 12, 2005 report. The motion carried (3-1 Councilmember Larson opposed). 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. No Smokinl! in the City Parks Policy Mr. Moore stated this proposed policy only applied to City owned Parks and Trails. This proposed policy would not apply to Ramsey County Tony Schmidt Park or any other future Ramsey Park or Trails located within Arden Hil1s, unless Ramsey County adopted a similar policy. Staff is recommending that one "Tobacco Free" sign be placed at the entrance of each City Park. Signage could be instal1ed on existing poles, fences or buildings within a particular park. Thus minimizing "sign pollution" and saving time and money on locates and the installation of sign posts. Any additional park signage requests would be submitted by staff to the PTRC for review and then forwarded to the City Council for approval. Trail signage would be limited to a trail head or the intersection of two trails. Signage could be installed on existing sign posts. Any additional trail signage requests would be submitted by staff to the PTRC for review and then forwarded to the City Council for approval. Staff is estimating that 22 signs would be required for City parks and 25 for trails, for a combined total of 47 signs.