Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />17 <br /> TGRS In-Ground HE <br />Geothermal <br />Wellfields <br />Cost per Ton of Cooling $/Ton $2,420 $5,000 $15,000 <br />Cost per MMBtu/hr of Heating $/MMBtu/hr $200,000 $830,000 $1,250,000 <br />Table 5. Estimated probable cost per unit of production capacity <br />Integrating heat transfer with the groundwater remediation process offers the lowest installation cost per <br />unit of energy, it could reduce the RCC district energy production source cost by over $7 million. The <br />groundwater remediation system would eliminate the requirement for 10 in-ground heat exchangers or 365 <br />geothermal wells (approximately 3.5 acres of wellfield). However, there is sufficient capacity for district <br />energy from other solutions if it is not possible to use the TGRS. Assuming the next available lowest-cost <br />energy solution is the in-ground heat exchangers, the impact on the total cost for production capacity is <br />shown in Table 6. <br /> <br />Without <br />TGRS <br />Connection <br />With TGRS <br />Connection <br />RCC Full District Energy MM$ $48.9 $41.7 <br />Town Center District Energy MM$ $26.0 $19.4 <br />Table 6. Cost comparison of the district energy system using the groundwater remediation system to the <br />energy system or not <br />4.3. District Energy System Distribution <br />The community-wide district energy distribution system would operate as a tepid water loop, enabling <br />buildings to both reject and extract heat. This system would be closed-loop and comprise supply and return <br />piping in the Town Center and Outlot A and single-pipe loops in the residential neighborhoods. The water in <br />this closed-loop tepid water system will originally come from the city water system, not the aquifer. <br />Constructed of high-density polyethylene (HDPE), the distribution piping is estimated to range in diameter <br />from 2 to 16 inches, except for service laterals. To serve every building on the RCC site a conceptual pipe <br />route is shown in Figure 9, the route includes over 45,000 trench feet (8.5 miles) of piping. <br />The estimated cost to install the piping network is $34.3 million. One strategy to reduce distribution costs <br />involves implementing a single-loop main pipe instead of the traditional supply and return mains. Each <br />building connection would require a supply and return service pipe equipped with a pump to circulate water. <br />The water would be drawn from the main loop, passed through a heat pump, and then returned to the loop. <br />This single-pipe loop approach was assumed for the residential neighborhoods, which reduces installation <br />costs. However, during periods of high demand, the loop may trend warmer or colder for buildings located <br />on the far end of the loop, slightly impacting their equipment efficiency. <br />