Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />28 <br />• Using biogas or green hydrogen to address hard-to-electrify loads <br />Each of these options has varied implications for carbon accounting and REC ownership and different levels <br />of value regarding resilience, environmental justice, and additionality (making an impact that would not <br />have happened otherwise). <br />7. Opportunities and Considerations <br />7.1. Xcel Geothermal Pilot <br />Xcel Energy is seeking innovative pilot projects to reduce their natural gas system emissions. A key focus is a <br />ground source geothermal heat pump pilot project, up to 500 tons, to serve a multi-use development. <br />Pending approval of the Natural Gas Innovation Act (NGIA), Xcel will initiate a siting analysis to identify <br />potential pilot locations. Comprehensive feasibility studies will then evaluate environmental and construction <br />challenges, load diversity, geothermal wellfield size, and drilling accessibility to select the optimal site. NGIA <br />approval is expected by late 2024, with a potential pilot location identified by mid-2025. Rice Creek <br />Commons appears to align well with the focus of this pilot, and the project team is tracking this potential <br />opportunity. <br />A challenge is the NGIA flat energy rate for buildings that are part of the pilot, which means those customers <br />would pay much lower energy bills than other buildings. To mitigate energy costs disparities and maximize <br />the pilot project’s compatibility with the goals of Rice Creek Commons, connecting the affordable housing <br />buildings to the pilot is a potential solution. Another option would be for the Xcel pilot to feed into a broader <br />district energy network serving RCC. This would eliminate the rate disparity concern and would make Xcel’s <br />energy available to all district energy system customers at RCC. <br />7.2. Potential Funding Sources <br />The analysis included Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funds, which reduce applicable capital costs by 40%. <br />These funds are available in the form of rebates for eligible capital costs. The Minnesota Climate Innovation <br />Finance Authority (MNCIFA) could potentially provide bridge funding for upfront costs before the rebates <br />come in. While the IRA is currently the major funding reduction available, additional funding sources could <br />become accessible before construction is scheduled for 2027. <br />8. Emission Analysis <br /> Once the community is fully developed in 2030, Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are estimated to generate less annual <br />carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions than the Business-as-Usual Scenario. Specifically, Scenario 1: District Energy <br />– Entire Development is estimated to generate 83% less annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions than the <br />Business-as-Usual Scenario, Scenario 2: District Energy – Town Center is estimated to generate 82% less <br />annual carbon dioxide emissions than the Business-as-Usual scenario, and Scenario 3: Decentralized <br />Geothermal is estimated to generate 79% less carbon dioxide emissions than the Business-as-Usual <br />scenario. These savings come from eliminating fossil fuel use, constructing high-performance buildings, and <br />using an alternate energy system (the technologies modeled in Scenarios 1, 2, and 3).